DesTinylDrEaMl

Can M60A2 be add in the game?

This thing is a hideous ugly lookin thing, but since the Sheridan isn't so amazing why not. It fits the rough time line and shouldn't break balance any more than the current ATGMs have. This thing looks like it would actually be a very good tank due to the profile of the turret. You'd essentially be shooting at nothing but the gun.

  • Upvote 1
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i support it, but some people may complain that america would have 2 ATGM tanks compared to all others. but still, +1

medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, GreenAid said:

The cutoff is technology mostly, dates don't matter for gameplay.

 

And still you are wrong, it's from 1969, the M60A3 is from 1980....

Really then ask the devs on a Q&A if they are going to add this Tank.

 

Quote

i support it, but some people may complain that america would have 2 ATGM tanks compared to all others. but still, +1

Only three American tanks can fire ATGMs out of the main gun M551 Sheridan, M60A2 Starship and the MBT-70.

Edited by Solid_Snake01
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, _23nick123 said:

i support it, but some people may complain that america would have 2 ATGM tanks compared to all others. but still, +1

 

Oh, there's no shortage of Soviet ATGM options. Germans have a few as well. 

  • Upvote 4
medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Choogleblitz said:

 

Oh, there's no shortage of Soviet ATGM options. Germans have a few as well. 

..And British are getting also a standard ATGM so those would be 2 too :p

medal medal medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, GreenAid said:

..And British are getting also a standard ATGM so those would be 2 too :p

Plenty of British options, like the Russians they have a bunch. Its just that most of them are armoured cars.

medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, GreenAid said:

Germany has the RkPz based on the HS-30 that could be added: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raketenjagdpanzer_1

 

Or the RakJPz Jaguar 1 which uses second-generation ATGMs (like the M551 Sheridan & IT-1): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_1 ;)

Also +1 for the M60A2, but it will probably be awhile before its get added since we just got the M60A1.

Edited by *Arkel-99
medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2‎-‎8‎-‎2016 at 7:56 PM, PantherAl said:

Oh yes please...

 

Day one wallet warrior right there, even if it was a awful tank IRL.

 

From what I've heard of it, it mostly suffered from rebliability of the missile system, breech and guidance?

 

So that wouldn't really matter in War Thunder if that's the case.

medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Personal experience with the Gun Missile system itself, yes.   It was a failure of a tank: about 15 years ahead of its time, if not 20.   We could come up with a similar tank now, and it would be everything we hoped for, but it was too much too soon.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/5/2016 at 5:41 AM, GreenAid said:

Germany has the RkPz based on the HS-30 that could be added: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raketenjagdpanzer_1

 

On 8/5/2016 at 2:45 PM, Choogleblitz said:

 

Oh, there's no shortage of Soviet ATGM options. Germans have a few as well. 

 

On 8/5/2016 at 2:53 PM, GreenAid said:

..And British are getting also a standard ATGM so those would be 2 too :p

 

On 8/5/2016 at 3:21 PM, Mercedes4321 said:

Plenty of British options, like the Russians they have a bunch. Its just that most of them are armoured cars.

yeah, but then that would be 4 new tanks total to add, which, well, would be possible i guess, but more work for gaijin.

 

On 8/5/2016 at 4:18 PM, *Arkel-99 said:

 

Or the RakJPz Jaguar 1 which uses second-generation ATGMs (like the M551 Sheridan & IT-1): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_1 ;)

Also +1 for the M60A2, but it will probably be awhile before its get added since we just got the M60A1.

 

didnt it come in 1978? which is a bit past the cut off date, or pushing it at the very least?

 

edit: wikipedia says it came in 1978, but the jaguar 2, it said it came in 1965??? :008:

Edited by _23nick123
medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, _23nick123 said:

didnt it come in 1978? which is a bit past the cut off date, or pushing it at the very least?

 

If you're talking about the endless Jaguar suggestions, then yes, it did. Albeit, the Jaguar might be power-creepy. 

  • Upvote 2
medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Choogleblitz said:

 

If you're talking about the endless Jaguar suggestions, then yes, it did. Albeit, the Jaguar might be power-creepy. 

yeah, but the jaguar 2 apparently came in 1965? which is before the jaguar 1? according to wikipedia.

 

medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, _23nick123 said:

yeah, but the jaguar 2 apparently came in 1965? which is before the jaguar 1? according to wikipedia.

 

 

Sounds like they quoted the Kanonenjagdpanzer for 1965, as it was based on it, because AFAIK the Jaguar 2 was a.... 1983(?) vehicle. 

Edited by Choogleblitz
medal medal medal medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Choogleblitz said:

 

Sounds like they quoted the Kanonenjagdpanzer for 1965, because AFAIK the Jaguar 2 was a.... 1983(?) vehicle. 

oh well that makes sense. well, still, the rakatenjagdpanzer 2 is alright. it has 2 missiles, which i think sorta counters the 1st generation aiming.

medal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.