Results45

Forums
New Forum Sections: Categorized Suggestions and CDK Community

   48 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like suggestions to be categorized?

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      1
  2. 2. What about a dedicated "Modding Community" subforum actively supported by developers and "CDK Expert" staff?

    • Definitely
      8
    • Not interested
      1
    • Restructure the current forums before adding a new one.
      1

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

43 posts in this topic

On 11/2/2016 at 10:29 AM, Target1331 said:

Still for it, esp. with the fact that the search function with the new forum is horrid.

Best regards,

 

Phil

 

If not persay "categorized", I kinda feel like topic tags in the "Moderated Suggestions" subforum should be standardized (i.e. when creating a topic, you can only choose from "USA/USSR/UK/Germany/Japan/France/Italy/International", "maps", "aircraft/loadouts", "ammunition", "ground vehicles", "MM/UI", "economy", "battle objectives", and "events") so what when you click on one of them like "Aircraft/Loadouts", it will pick-out & list all the aircraft suggestions for you.

 

Or an even better stopgap solution would be to add those tags in the "Filter" tab so that you can pick-out which kinds of suggestions you would like to look at.

Edited by Results45
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it would be good to find things easier

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dawned on me: why is it that we virtually never see any of the 100 devs check-out the community ideas here during a 12-hour span Monday to Friday?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this. It would also be nice to categorized by who posted the suggestion, ie by author. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very surprised this hasn't been passed yet. I supported this idea ever since you originally posted it, and that was quite some time ago!

 

This would REALLY help with the neatness & organization of suggestions.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/26/2017 at 11:45 AM, *jermster18 said:

I like this. It would also be nice to categorized by who posted the suggestion, ie by author. 

 

Wish I could demonstrate the idea on a working forum site (like this), but sadly, I am no Suggestions Helper or Administrator :sleep:.

Edited by Results45
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't I vote YES for this more than once???  :crying:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall this suggestion + clearer numbers regarding how many votes needed to move to further discussion/developers

 

also how refined will categories get?  like for instance, would my suggestion go under low tier/biplane suggestion sub-category if one existed?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

12 hours ago, *face_guy_epic said:

Overall this suggestion + clearer numbers regarding how many votes needed to move to further discussion/developers

 

also how refined will categories get?  like for instance, would my suggestion go under low tier/biplane suggestion sub-category if one existed?

 

That would depend on how far the suggestion staff are willing to extend the main sub-categories (I'll give an example here later today).

 

 

Edited by Results45
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

+1 :good:

 

First, I have always liked the Forum structure and content things like the Suggestion thread and the Academy thread are awesome.

 

But a little unorganized and lacking transparency and structure that best help us the community.

 

So yes I agree with this suggestion more or less as a process improvement to suggestions/proposal made to be managed and addressed correctly by developers answering them.

 

For example, I have a list of my own suggestions and ideas here also that I would like implemented or at least given a response from a Developer like a final decision/statement before closing and archiving the suggestion put forward.

 

My current suggestions and development ideas for the game list here below:-

 

  1. Training Range - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/350175-war-thunder-weapons-target-training-range-development-and-school-academy-proposal/
  2. More Skins- https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/348329-blue-angels-skins/&do=findComment&comment=6751313
  3. Time in games - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/182693-the-length-of-arcade-battles-opinions-of-the-community/&do=findComment&comment=6752944
  4. New and Large MAPS - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/344348-maps-map-design-feedback/&do=findComment&comment=6681318
  5. Helicopters - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/350246-why-are-there-no-post-wwii-helicopters/
  6. Bronco OV-10A online store inventory - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/327284-ov-10a-bronco/&
  7. War Thunder Online Store - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/351297-i-think-improved-development-and-game-revenue-concept-is-needed-for-war-thunder-online-shop-front/&do=findComment&comment=6768553
  8. Camera Views - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/351876-simulation-battle-mode-external-views-for-situational-awareness-sa-realistic-operational-requirement-checks/&do=findComment&comment=6777307
  9. Add fully working cockpits and instruments realistic - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/354806-creating-more-realism-when-starting-aircraft/&do=findComment&comment=6822443
  10. Add improved joystick settings more steady movement and simulation on air craft -  https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/351876-simulation-battle-mode-external-views-for-situational-awareness-sa-realistic-operational-requirements/
  11. Custom Battle Mode further development - https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/354955-a-war-thunder-custom-battles-tactical-engagement-mission-builder-requestproposal/&do=findComment&comment=6822302

 

Those that understand both arcade and simulation "MIL-SIM" gaming will understand and want these inclusions into the game for immersion, realism and fun.

 

So then anything to help this be managed better I support wholeheartedly or at least answered by a developer through an improved process.

 

And going by Poll Votes I'm not alone in my thoughts on this matter.

 

Cheers

 

 

 

 

Edited by SkyKnight2014
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes please, great idea. it is a zoo in the suggestions, I go through about 4 pages and I'm done. And with the CDK, I've stopped using it cos there's just not enough info. you have my support

:DD

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.