Electrolite_xyz

Way of the Samurai
  • Content count

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
medal

Electrolite_xyz last won the day on March 18

Electrolite_xyz had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

220 Neutral

About Electrolite_xyz

  • Rank
    Warrant officer
  • Birthday 09/04/1997

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brazil, under a rock
  • Interests
    The grind is hard but someday it will pay off....

Recent Profile Visitors

743 profile views
  1. balance

    That`s not me and not the focus of the Topic, just don`t post something off the main focus of the topic because someone random said it as well LOL. You started so well with some good arguments, then you failed right here ``The guy is pretty much by default biased towards the axis faction.`` Should I bother answering? Yeah ok I will...... Doom plays every nation, there is no sign anywhere from any video that he is a ``The guy is pretty much by default biased towards the axis faction.``. On live streams he never played Leos, his favorite jet is the Mig 15 bis nothing points to an axis fanboy so what I think is that you are just a limited hater. Besides his opinion is not the truth but it`s basing my argument. It`s called Argument from authority. He is an good player and plays the game all day long, his opinion should be respected. And if you don`t like him Mike Goes Boom and Napalm also made videos about it, not to mention MORE youtubers that talked about the issue, so yeah hope you just got it
  2. balance

    This topic isn`t about Germany being weak. I won`t even waste my time aswering because you are not the first to come just to say something like this. Go read the topic before post BS please
  3. balance

    Tiger II fuel is a big problem specially on Sla. Look at this vídeo, the Diesel fuel explodes almost all the time and it's alaways the same spot.... Im pretty sure it's bugged. Do you know any source for this fuel under the crew? I would love to make a bug report on the issue.
  4. I agree, why not put it as a 7.3 and give it the post shell like the IS2 had?
  5. balance

    I agree with everything. But what kills me is that th T29 can counter it's weakness I suffer a lot facing it on a ST-A2. Turret has lot of armor and spalling shield, Hull weakspot got tracks to protect it, lower plate is unreliable and the ammo rack hidden. I also love using the Tiger 105mm, the cannon rocks. But when you say that you pen the UFP you mean you evade the tracks right? Because I noticed that if I touch the tracks the shot will bounce. This ammo on turret thing on the 105mm is old when there were no other tanks to balance germany. They should remove it by now. Someone should do a suggestion
  6. balance

    And as you said the King Tiger is a sniper. Problem is, its even harder to kill a T29 from long range, the 88mm dont pack enough punch
  7. balance

    Yet another video on the issue by Napalmratte
  8. Ground vehicles

    It was changed a long time ago
  9. balance

    And this video as well from Mike Goes Boom
  10. balance

    This is becoming a waste of time, we walk in circles, you keep pushing the topic to the same things, if you don`t agree with me fine but keep this back and forth game is a waste. The 105mm and Panther II were planned so what? A proto doesnt make the vehicle ``less paper`` none of the proto nor the design phase whent to full production anyway. These vehicles were going to be made. This discussion is irrelevant, paper vehicles existed, exist and even more will be added, you opinion won`t change a thing, the 105mm and Panther II vehicles are here end. The rest of things you wrote where the same thing, so I wont bother aswering to you same questions so you will come back to the same questions yet again. I will leave this Orange Doom video. I don`t agree with everything but it`s a nice analysis and combo well with my topic This doesnt only apply to German but also Japan and to some extent, Russia
  11. balance

    These seem nice, as for Japan we can have maybe the STA3 and STA4 that are almost Type 61 but with HEATFS removed, I think they would be decent in 6.7 also maybe some heavy proto and I also saw a 105mm tank destroyer on Chi Ri II chassis that could be maybe 6 or 6.3. Japan still got some juice to get nice tanks. You need to understand that then you people managed but it was not an ideal situation and THAT`S WHY late Gaijin even added the bad steel to King Tiger post war shell to IS2 that was not ideal in any way.... and now the opposite happens to Germany and Japan. The nation is so desperate for 6.7 vehicles that Gaijin added the RU251 as a 6.7 vehicle, this is one of the most ridiculous BR I ever seen, feels like when the F2H faced prop planes. The thing is how much time Gaijin can force the RU251 as a 6.7 tank? Not long in my opinion, and then the 6.7 void will become worse yet again. You don`t get it. Even as a Axis players I never agree with this and the years were USA was completely rekt was a big mistake. And I was there asking for the lowering BR for the Jumbo and etc. So now it`s kinda sad that when Axis is facing some issues in game (issues that not only affect us because as I said for every nation people with 6 br tanks are being overtiered a lot) people just try to put all the dirty under a rag and say it`s fine. See, even you recognize the issue. The lack of 6.7 tanks force the MM to mix in 7 br vehicles to fill the games and they cause havoc. So you in the end agree with me. Which is not a problem at all as at least 1/3 of vehicles from ALL NATIONS are at least not mass produced tanks. Panther II was planned to have the 88mm it`s historical. If Gaijin ***** up and got the wrong turret (like they did with the STA1 and STA2) then make a bug repport. But this doesn`t change anything. As I said the Panther II in game is not a representation of the completed Panther II hull with wrong turret. It is the origial designed best case scenario tank so what`s the matter huh????? Coelian was just a mock up and no one conplains about it, on the other hand people cry about the R2Y being paper. I guess I get it, it`s double standard, if the vehicle is bad no one cares but it the vehicle is good people say it`s a paper. It`s nice how people alter their reality to something that is convenient for them..... Exactly, what`s the real difference from a prototype and a planned tank that WAS GOING to be made if something else happened. Just because your prototype was made doesn`t mean it`s more real than a planned design. The proto is full of problems imperfections and errors it`s barely a usable vehicle and both are not mass produced Also the engine was designed. As long as the vehicle is not something completelly off and impossible like the Rattle there is no problem. No this is a modification of the original Panther II plan after Germany facing problems in the design, they gave up the Panther II to keep making normal Panther II. This vehicle you show me is when they just gave up the original Panther II design. The tank we have in game is the original designs with the 88mm. Also you game me an idea, maybe the historical panther II could be added as a 6.7 tank. But it was designed, same argument, so what if it was not designed. Not only German, ALL NATIONS have paper and proto to fulfill the trees. IF ALL NATIONS HAVE THIS why the Panther II is such a issue for you? Yak 30, I-185, Ki200, R2Y2, OBJ 906, T29, T34, so many protos and looks like you have no problem with them. They would need to add to other nations like IS3 armor shattering with a hammer or T34 gear failing or having 5 min of fuel to fly with Japan, image such a nice and fun idea to everyone? Maybe the Yak`s engine could explode at take off like in real life. Looks like Gaijin noticed how completely stupid this idea was No, these 2 vehicles do well. With the lack of 6.7 tanks almost 7.3 game you play is undertiered and I know this because I play the JPZ 4-5. And even if you get in 8 games you have no problem killing anything there the same way as people say that the Panther II 88mm has no problem killing anything at BR 8. So this is no argument, German tanks are more squishy at 8 br than Russia and if people say that the Panther II is fine facing 8 br tanks so I`m sure the IS3 and T54 are as well. And when these vehicles get undertiered they club. No, we add more 6.7 worth vehicles in game and simply change the Panther II br with the RU251 or even put the RU at 7.3 But if you prefer the RU at 6.7 and panther at 7 no problem as well.... Tiger P is slow and can be easily pen from the turret from all these tanks above. So you say that the Tiger II P is better than the M56, T92, T95, T34100 M46 ???? you are dreaming............... These tanks listed are faster than the Tiger P and pen it`s turret. What`s the reason of being slow and having armor if anything will pen you? YOU DONT NEED TO PEN THE UFP. If you are firing at the UFP you are doing something wrong. Tiger II P turret simply sucks. Panthers as well bad turret easy pen. Jagdpanther is a TD can flan, some of the tanks listed can even pen it and it has very bad reverse so once it`s in problem it won`t escape. Ferdinand is slow and has the hull cheeks. See all the vehicles listed have noticeable weak points, some of them ARE SLOW WHILE BEING EASY TO PEN at the same time. That`s why they are all 6.0 or 6.3 tanks, hope I could explain. The only thing they got is good guns, but M46, a M26 T99, M26E1, T26E1, T92s, m56s, T-34-100s, T95s all have good guns as well But they are all as fast if not faster and also HAVE MUCH BETTER REVERSE. That`s why they are 6.7 and the Panther is 6.0 . Some tanks you listed like T95, T34-100 M56 have even MUCH BETTER guns. Once again the problem is not if a tank is good there or not. The void in 6.7 is the issue. As you said, Jagdtigers are killing everyting and this happens because there are not enough 6.7 to fill games. We can also lower some of these american tanks BR
  12. balance

    So you didn`t read my post. I explicitly said germany JAPAN AND RUSSIA. Please read before saying anything. No it`s not, the In game Panther II was the best case scenario for the it. Germany wanted to increase compatibility between the King Tiger and Panthers hence the changes in it`s design. And even if it was a complete Frankenstein what does this has to do with what I said? You didn`t even respond what I said nor commented anything about it. What does it matter if it`s not full made? Coelian, Kugel, IT1, I185, OBJ 905, R2Y2, Chi Ri II, STA1 and A2, T34 and T29, T95all these vehicles AND MUCH MORE were paper vehicles or never went full mass production. So WHO CARES? The game is full of this type of vehicles why the Panther II and Tiger 105mm concern you so much? I dont` see how this how anything to do with the topic. Bad reverse speed. At least the F got good reload so good reload + speed would be better. The thing is that it`s a kinda idiotic addition to the game. If they want realistic things what about when you play Japan you can`t take off because there is no fuel of using T34 you need to unlock the hammer modification to change gear. This was done years ago when there was no competition to the King, this changed a lot. Why the KT got to have this implemented but there are no other historical issues with other vehicles and nations? If people did pressure and kept conplaining it would change That`s the problem. Is not the lack of 6.7 capable vehicles. It`s the lack of vehicles in this BR in fact. With this big void in 6.7 the MM is forced to bring 7 br tanks to the game to fill it and this destroys the gameplay for anyone using a 6 br tanks. Lots of games are 6 - 7 br battles depending of the time you are playing. And these old 6.7 vehicles had their BR lowered for a reason, they are acceptable for 6.7 games but they are not as good as other 6.7 vehicles this is why the BR was lowered so we still are in the same place with the same issue
  13. balance

    That`s not the issue, please read the entire post Panther was a little too good but it was needed for Germany, it was the only fast tier IV vehicle That`s nice ideas. If panther II is too good mayber a 6 br panther with better engine. I never searched is this bad metal on KT really a thing? Because if yes it`s a big BS Problem is the massive overtier that happen. The lack of 6.7 in comparassion with 7.0 and 7.3 br forces 6.0 and 6.3 br tanks to be uptiered much more like the guy here said. As you can see every nation with 6 and 6.3 tanks suffer with this. What a Jumbo is supposed to do against 7 br tanks? The thing is that I don`t consider premium vehicles. Most of people don`t have premiums so they can`t really be considered as a decisive factor in populating the games. On the other hand people are FORCED to use these british tanks to advance to tier V so we are guarantee to have these vehicles in the games And I agree with you, I feel dirty using the Leopard, its so ridiculous. And those shermans? I doubt the 40`s stablizer was that good. If Gaijin wants to add such a game changing feature at least do it properly and tone the stab down for older vehicles
  14. balance

    It`s true but these tanks lack speed. That`s why people used the Panther II it`s the only fast tier IV tank. (Yes pantehr A is fast but gun is not so good and reverse speed is terrible) I have every single German tank, I could just play 7 BR but I`m here trying to help the grind to everyone. Not only German but all the 6 - 6.3 br tanks that have to face so many 7 br matches with IS2, Jubmo and other tanks. Gaijin added the RU at 6.7 because the extreme lack of speed in tier IV but again I think it`s better for everyone for the RU to be a 7br AT LEAST and bring the Panther II to 6.7 again
  15. balance

    I never said it does. It`s so simple I will explain again. German`s only 6.7 tank is the King Tiger and they lack any fast light tank (RU is premium) So we have King Tiger with not much support and when the person die they have to use a 6.0 vehicle to face much more 6.7 tanks that the enemy can have as backup.... Well for me in Germany and Japan we always face a full allies team with British German and Russia. That`s the reason of the post, Gaijin should focus on more 6.7 tanks for Japan, Russia and German as they lack them. The SLA and RU are premiums so I don`t count them, I think it`s wrong to consider them as most people wont`t have it. it`s not the rule. RU251 should be 7.3 alongside IS6 and this will remove again a fast tank for Germany at 6.7. I think that Panther II should be brought back to 6.7. I prefer the Panther II at 6.7 and the Ru251 at 7.3 or 7 than the other way around....... Russia has no 6.7 tank outside premium so they affect the games by forcing a lot of 6 and 6.3 tanks into 7 br battles which is bad not only for German but all nations. Jumbo and ST suffer so much there.... Caernarvon is good as well and first Cent too. The issue is that Gaijin needs to buff the APDS again. It so terrible
  16. balance

    The T29 has 2 issues 1 - It has a lot of crew and the commander is safe far in the back of the turret. 2 - The T29 has hidden ammo racks under the tank so even side shots are no hit kill unlike on the tiger that has a easy side ammo rack unless you aim very low and risk not killing the crew and not exploding the ammo with ap The gun is also much better but its not a decisive factor
  17. balance

    No the T32 was tier IV and it was SPAMMED in clan battles like there was no tomorrow. I`m not sure if you have problems but you know... german and US aren`t the only nations in game. Russia with IS2 were suffering as well with T32, there was nothing russia could do to face T32 except the IS3 and T54 but that`s not for everyone so stop with this **** talk that German whine, because Gaijin WILL NEVER increase a vehicle BR because some random people conplain. If this favoritism towards German was real they would NEVER have increased the Panther II BR so please stop with this BS. Gaijin watch the tank stats as well not only the community If they heard the community the IS6 would be a 6.7 vehicle Well you kinda proved my point again. I said the American line was always more homogenous, while German had the King Tiger America had all these mentioned vehicles no to talk about the other vehicles, so thanks again.... What I mean is that THERE ARE NO NATIVE 6.7 TANKS only inferior 6.3 or 6.0 vehicles that can be USABLE in 6.7 games but that can just be a substitute for a NATIVE 6.7 vehicle. It`s not so hard to understand. Of course you can bring the Panthers to your game but they are 6.0 vehicles for a reason, they simply are not as good as other NATIVE 6.7 tanks. And as I said USA and Britain have A LOT of 6.7 tanks. It`s so simple
  18. balance

    For the King Tiger I agree, it`s a heavy tank after all, facing T29 with STA1 and A2 and Panther A, D, F is just as hard and people say it`s not a problem, you should flank so yeah same thing for both tanks. Panther II had a much bigger weakspot on turret and weak lower glacis so with this one I dont agree, it was no hard to kill at all. Well yeah I have been using the STA1 when it was 6.7.... you think I have fun facing the T29? I have the same 170mm american APHE so I don`t see the issue. In the end I don`t even know why we are talking about this, why people have to bring King Tiger vs T29 in every topic, this is not the mean of the topic, all I want to say is that Germany, Japan and Russia lack 6.7 tanks and this causes issue on the MM and for Germany and Japan it`s worse because they are forced to play together while in the other hand USA and Britain with a lot of 6.7 fight together that`s all. This topic is not about KT being OP or M46 sucking
  19. Gameplay

    This topic needs to be revived, I think AT LEAST the shell priority thing should be passed to development, it`s such a small thing but makes so much difference in the gameplay, it can help in a lot of situations
  20. balance

    USA spammed the T32, when it got a BR increase and set to tier V they never spammed a vehicle because they had more 6.7 tanks even then and it was more homogenous. At that time USA lack a good heavy tank so I`m not sure why you talk about this as it`s in the past and it irrelevant to the topic anyway. Yes of couse, what do you think panthers, STA1 and other vehicles have to to? Flank flank flank so I don`t see the issue Actually panther D got a bad gun so it`s except Panther II only, but the Panther II is 7 br, so we come back to the main issue of the topic and you actually are helping me to prove my point. Panthers as you said can`t pen a lot of stuff at 6.7 and above so we are FORCED to use the King Tiger to play the game, see? you agree with me, you even proved my point No, T29 got more crew, T29 crew disposition with the far away commander makes it impossible to hit kill, T29 ammo is hidden under the tank, much harder to hit, T29 got a much better gun. T29 is simple superior, not by much but superior Also you feel hurt talking like that, did you suffer too much against germany? It looks like
  21. balance

    This depends, each tank has something over the other. T44100 had much faster turret speed and also the 100mm can be considered superior, the turret weakspot on the Panther is arguably easier to hit (altough the T44 has less crew) so both vehicles are very tied, the thing is Russia isnt forced to fight on 6.7 max games with less vehicles on this br. That`s the thing, T29 (as spammed as a normal vehicle) and T34 can hold the King Tiger and them for support USA got great light tanks with HEATS. Germany doesn`t have this, we were desperate for a light tank and guess what Gaijin did? Made it premium... but despite what they did to the T29 they at least added the T34 later, for Germany I think we will never have a light tier IV vehicle, so forever we will have this problem of lack of support to or big slow tanks. Have you ever stoped to think that the King Tiger is spammed simply because THERE ARE NO OTHER TANK TO USE IN 6.7 and that if we added more 6.7 vehicles we would lower the spam? And in forums from people with BOTH Tiger II and T29 most of them said the T29 was superior to the King Tiger, I sincerely think the T29 is more comparable to the TIger 105mm
  22. Why people always bring German in the chat? Do people from both sides got mental issues? The IS6 is causing problems on the entire meta, when Soviets face USA they rolfstomp them, IS6 is spammed in arcade and IS6 is spammed even on clan battles, destroying all clan competition (like the T32 once did) you think that with this tank cause so much issue and with ridiculous win rates that only German players are conplaining? Yeah nice try IS6 weakspot is very small and easily hidden behind the long cannon, the troly armor with spaced factor makes it worse, this weakspot is not realiable to kill the tank and even penetrated won`t kill it most of times. This combined to extreme speed and very good reverse speed and you have all the fuss it`s causing. Both IS6 and RU251 should be 7.3 Gaijin getting all the premiums money
  23. Ground vehicles

    Premiums vehicles added should complement the tech tree as USA already got a good tier IV heavy there is no reason to also give the Tiger II to USA. This will obviously destroy the MM. When this topic was made the T29 wasn't a thing so this request just became obsolete
  24. balance

    It's true, but look what I said at the above comment ''You are right, German 7 br is very good. The issue is that there are so many 7 br tanks that 6, 6.3 and 6.7 tanks get much more overtier games. And this is not a problem for german only, ALL nations suffer. IS2, STA1, Jumbo and others can`t do much against 7 br tanks. But in the case of a 6.7 MAX match, German and Japan are the ones who suffers, they only have 1 6.7 vehicle to spawn in.''
  25. I think both Ki67 could get a .3 BR reduction, lack of 800kg bomb really hurt the planes. One of the issues at tier IV is the lack of 6.7 vehicles. Relevant 6.7 vehicles (RB) USA T34 T29 (PREM) T95 T26E1 M46 M56 T92 M26 (PREM) M46 (PREM) M26 T99 German King Tiger King Tiger (PREM) RU 251 (PREM) URSS (yes it's in portuguese so nevermind it) T34 100 (PREM) Brtain Caernarvon STRV (PREM) FV4005 Tortoise Japan Type 60 SPRG As you can see there is a serious tank gap for Japan, Germany and Russia, this is becoming a serious issue that causes a lot of problem in the game. For example overtier happens much more for 5.7, 6.0, 6.3 (because there are way too many 7 and 7.3 vehicles in the game and a lack of 6.7) Vehicles like Panther A, G, F, M26, Jumbo, ST-A1, A2, IS2 etc end up suffering a lot in these cases On the other hand the 7br has most benefits, almost all games are undertiered (7br mixed with 7.3 and 6.7 and lower) and 8 br games are extremely rare. Other problem is for the very common German + Japan games. If a 6.7 game happens the chance of the team losing is very high, this happens because as shown above Japan and German desperately need 6.7 vehicles, Russia even tho they lack a 6.7 tank don't suffer so much in this case as most of the games they fight alongside USA and Britain.
  26. balance

    I think a full shuffle of teams in RB would be a nice quick fix. You are right, German 7 br is very good. The issue is that there are so many 7 br tanks that 6, 6.3 and 6.7 tanks get much more overtier games. And this is not a problem for german only, ALL nations suffer. IS2, STA1 and others can`t do much against 7 br tanks. But in the case of a 6.7 MAX match, German and Japan are the ones who suffers, they only have 1 6.7 vehicle to spawn in.
  27. balance

    I play Germany Japan and starting britain, yes I play other nations I use the American 90mm and I like it also whenever I see a video of the T32 they never have problem using their gun as other example I never see the IS6 having much issues Are you crazy? That`s why I separated them into a (PREM) category with full caps, you want even more notation? And if I wanted to add premiums to help into my argumentation I would not have added German premiums so get off I listed every 6.7 premium in the game. You tried to use premiums as a fix to the BR this is a completely different story. Yes M56 could easily br at 7br I would keep it at 6.7 so it can have a place with the T44100 existing It could be a 7 br tank but it got low ammo and bad ballistics for gun, they are slow and big drop. Yes but the BR (when Gaijin doesn`t xxxx up the balance) is a direct reflex of the tank performance and the BR also limits what tanks faces what. In a MAX 6.7 game when German and Japan play together with both only 1 6.7 worth vehicle things go wrong most of the times It can`t same way as most tanks can`t one shot the T29 and T34. Even the King Tiger can`t reliably hit kill the T29 so..... Survivability isn`t everything I said this multiple times. We can one shot kill the T44100 it`s a bad tank by any means? The M56 is bad? Type 60 is bad? Leopard is bad? I don`t think so....
  28. just saying if you accidentaly wrote it wrong and meant something else....
  29. balance

    The M46 is much more agile than the ST that`s why the ST got lowered BR. Not every one. Type 60, M56 scorp, T34-100 there are quite vehicles that should stay at 6.7 anyway. Well that`s my issue. ``like I said already, they still get into 6.7 matches regardless and they are barely a match against a KTP.`` and as neither Japan nor German have other 6.7 tank they got to face them using lower BR vehicles, doesn`t seem fair huh? And again British and American advantage is clear, specially because these 2 nations with no other 6.7 tanks are forced to play together T26 is barely capable? The almost T32 cannon is barely capable? what? really? M46 can destroy the KT in a well placed shot. And don`t tell me it`s hard to kill it because it`s hard to kill T29 and T34 using Panthers and STA1. Yeah no, I have critical tought, from all 6.7 american tanks only the M46 and M26 are kinda bad at the BR but even them can work at 6.7
  30. balance

    What I mean is that USA doesn`t only got tanks equivalent to the King Tiger but they ALSO got other 6.7 tanks, which doesn`t happen to Germany neither Japan (And those 2 nations fight together with only 1 6.7 vehicle) so the advantage to USA and Britain with more 6.7 is clear, simple as that. And every BR got vehciels that are a little too good and obviously if the vehicles will be moved to 6.7 they need to fit there
  31. balance

    Yes a black hole, King Tiger comma T29, T34. Yes it`s a black hole but I think the uptier of the Panther II affected 6.7 german more than Gaijin expected A 6.3 TD will never be comparable to 6.7 tanks and light tanks. Britain and USA got everything for 6.7 from TD to Light tank to Heavy. I tried STA1 and A2 at 6.7, one of the worse things in my life, they are barely useful at 6.3 with a lot of work, they cant compete in 6.7. But I think the STA3 and A4 could work at 6.7 also a Heavy tank and Tank Destroyer could be added. Yes but on battles you can have full 6.7 games or games where most tanks are 6.7 vehicles, in this case it`s a problem again
  32. You just wrote the same thing
  33. balance

    The issue isnt the IS6 itself, before patch 1.67 almost every 6.7 game had 7 br tanks, so I took the 105mm tiger and had a much better time, I noticed that almost all 7 br games never had 8 br tanks or even 7.7 No I`m asking for more 6.7 material or lower some 7 br tanks to 6.7 to hold things back a little. Panther II could be 6.7, maybe even T44 100, IS2 as well, lot of vehicles could be brought to 6.7. Gaijin tried to fix it by adding a 7.3 or above tank as a 6.7 premium (RU) but this won`t fix the issue
  34. balance

    Do you have a problem? I`m not talking of German Only, if take the time to read the entire post I also talk about Russia and Japan Besides so what. USA has equal tank to the King Tiger AND other 6.7 tanks. Germany and Japan only got Type 60. And Russia has no 6.7 tank in the normal line.
  35. Lol the M56 nimble small and with HEATFS isnt a match to the King Tiger? Please stop. And so what if it`s hard to face the King Tiger, it`s arguably hard to kill a T29 and there it is at 6.7 wrecking things. So you think that German and Japan should have only 1 6.7 tank and be forced to play together? yeah good idea. And when you die with Japan you go face 6.7 tanks with the Sta1 yeah very nice. Most games German will be with Japan, most games there won`t be a full Tiger Team because there will be a mix of BR and ****. Also KT arent immortal they can be easily killed My points horrendous? You still didn`t show anything to prove me wrong, all you said is that the King Tiger is a good tank so german should only have 1 6.7 tank. On the other hand I couldn`t care less about you or your stats, but if I waste my time to check them I do hope your stats are at least better than you very limited argumentation capacity. Still waiting for any solid point to deny more 6.7 tanks to germany or japan
  36. So I think we should change the M56 scorpion to 8br, it can kill any tank in the Game.... M46 fires King Tiger turret, done.... it was really hard was it? Just because a tank can be destroyed doest mean we can lower the BR, there are other factors. Or leo could be a 5 br tank.
  37. Problem isnt the T29 and T34, we crossed the threshold the last changes were enough to xxxx up the MM. The 75 is inferior but it can still kill. The fact that we cann kill these tanks is irrelevant man. The panther is 6.3 is there for a reason. Just because it can kill some 6.7 tanks doesn`t mean anything. These panther are 6.3 vehicles. By your logic the ASU57 would be fine at 7.7 games, it can kill almost the entire german line Premium tanks are irrelevant, you can`t consider to the stats, german still lacks 6.7 tanks. The King Tiger P is 6.3 as well
  38. When did I said you dont play germany? You still don't get it, it's so simple. The Tiger II is competitive but it's the only 6.7 tank. Doesn't matter if it can hit kill enemies or survive shots, **** HAPPENS and when you die, and you WILL eventually die and when you die all the tanks you have are from an inferior BR while on the T29 for example when you die you have other 6.7 tanks to spawn in. It's so simple but you dont get it, you think I am the issue? So you think all the sudden losing with German 6.7 is simply caused by players issues? Wake up. You think the issue is that I can't aim? I have 2k+ hours in the game, I'm a level 100 player with good stats like you but the problem remains. I can use the King Tiger but when I die I have to use a 6.3 tank to face 6.7 enemies. 6.7 meta isnt fair for the Axis. Its so simple.... German used to do it as well when they had the Panther II and King Tiger and didn't had much competition, but the meta changed, neither russia nor german can do this anymore. Yes there was no competition but new issues appear, Japan wasnt in the game and the fact remains, Japan and Germany don't have 6.7 vehicles. You have a very special MM then because today I played the entire day and not once I had such teams
  39. No. Because we have games with 6.7 BR MAX. It's those games where germany lose the most. So I guess it's your point that makes no sense. Im talking about 6.7 max games. And they happen a lot because the King Tiger and T29 usage. But german has no backup in this case. Also not counting the superior american planes in tank destroying roles. Japanese CAS is a joke as well. You see how deep the issue is? ''Its losing because of the amount of *bad* players flocking to Germany because of the perception that Tiger Is and Tiger IIs are invincible godly tanks and thus get destroyed.'' I would agree in some patches ago but the Tiger I and II stomp is over, your reason for the problem is very simple, mere Bad players dont explain anything. ''7.0 is definitely Russia's game but 6.7 is a duel between US and Ger tanks for complete supremacy.''????? Really? what battle? A single 6.7 tank vs more than 5 non premium 6.7 tanks? Yeeeah sure...
  40. Yes they added it for it but it's a premium so it doesn't fix the issue also the RU doesn't belong to 6.7 anyway.... All the tanks you listed were premiums and the ''good tank destroyers'' are 6.3 which futher proves my point, we don't have 6.7 vehicles so we are forced to fight using 6.3 tanks. And yes German teams suck but they used to be better and win more. People don't sudenly become idiots, something ELSE happened to cause the issue. Russia does well for 2 simple reasons 1 - they fight in ALMOST all the games alongside USA and Britain so in 6.7 games they don't suffer so much. 2 - They have a lot of 7 and 7.3 br tanks. If you look at the tree the number of 7br vehicles is MUCH MUCH biggers so in lots of 7 br games Russia faces 6.7 teams. In this case Japan and Germany have to face 7 br teams with a single 6.7 vehicle. You see the issue? It's not this hard to spot. Also both German and Japan that lack 6.7 vehicles play TOGETHER every game and you don't need to be smart to know what happens next... A quick fix would bring a total team shuffle, stop this Allies VS Axis MM
  41. Wrong. The game was at other meta at that time, we had the Panther II at 6.7 and other vehicles were not added to the game, we also didn't had Japan. Also what happened in the past doesn't matter, we are talking about the current meta right now. Doensn't matter if it's the most played tank. It's losing anyway. And to hell with King Tiger, I never said it's not a competitive tank, the fact is that a Tank can't win the game alone with no support, if there are no other 6.7 vehicle to respawn in the game it's obvious you can't compete. The matter is not the King Tiger it's the lack of 6.7 vehicles And no matter what you people say you can't deny facts and stats. Look at my battle results, look at Axis win rate in the BR, look at this topic name, IS6 players are getting hilarious results.
  42. This is irrelevant using your logic RU251 can be killed with a tier II gun so it can be a 3 BR tank? These vehicles are at 6.7 BR for a reason, being killed by a 88mm is IRRELEVANT the problem remains, there are no 6.7 vehicles for Germany or Japan
  43. German as well. Or change some BR as well. I think the Panther II should be brought back to 6.7 as a quick fix until the situations is resolved this and other BR changes
  44. So you telling me that having to rely on 6.3 vehicles to face mass 6.7 enemies is right? All these tanks are inferior to 6.7 counterpars, so this argument is invalid. These ''decent'' backups aren't enough, we need 6.7 tanks. Look at my battle results you think this is normal? All these games were at the same BR range of 6.7. Russia lacks 6.7 as well but it's irrelevant for them as they don't face USA and Britain. USA 6.7 T34 T29 (PREM) T95 T26E1 M46 M56 T92 M26 (PREM) M46 (PREM) M26 T99 (PREM) German 6.7 King Tiger King Tiger (PREM) RU 251 (PREM) URSS (yes it's in portuguese so nevermind it) 6.7 T34 100 (PREM) Brtain 6.7 Caernarvon STRV (PREM) FV4005 Tortoise Japan 6.7 Type 60 SPRG
  45. balance

    I love Japan but I got to say that whoever plays alongside it has a problem. It's like the Japanese part of the Team is holding the game down and well it's German that has to play alongside Japan all the time. So we have 2 nations with no 6.7 tanks facing extreme competition and it's a recipe to failure. We get results like this one. I think addin the ST-A3 and A4 as 6.7 can help mabe add a second version of the Type 61 in a bracket just to fill more vehicles. We can hope for a very unknown crazy japanese Heavy at this Br as well but the game can't stay like this. A good Stop gap fix might be shuffle all the teams, let Japan be allied with every other nation and vice versa not this Axis vs Allies anymore. Until then we have results like this for Tier IV.......
  46. About the guy saying Germany is OP. Just no..... These are constant results I get day after day since before patch 1.65
  47. balance

    IS6 is 7 br, but as I said in the post, every 7 br game is undertiered so this thing is stomping with W/L rates of 75 per cent or above
  48. One of the problems with axis 6.7 is the lack of vehicles in this BR for German and Japan. Germany gets the King Tiger and Japan gets the Type 60, that's all, end of story, after dying have fun facing enemies on a Panther A or ST-A1..... 6.7 axis is terrible to play, I had to remove USA servers as it's almost a insta lose, at least on Europe things are a little better
  49. With recent changes in the BR and new vehicles additions we are creating a dangerous gap at 6.7 BR. Looking at the tree: Relevant 6.7 vehicles (RB) USA T34 T29 (PREM) T95 T26E1 M46 M56 T92 M26 (PREM) M46 (PREM) M26 T99 (PREM) German King Tiger King Tiger (PREM) RU 251 (PREM) URSS (yes it's in portuguese so nevermind it) T34 100 (PREM) Brtain Caernarvon STRV (PREM) FV4005 Tortoise Japan Type 60 SPRG As you can see there is a serious tank gap for Japan, Germany and Russia, this is becoming a serious issue that causes a lot of problem in the game. For example overtier happens much more for 6.0, 6.3 (because there are way too many 7 and 7.3 vehicles in the game and a lack of 6.7) Vehicles like Panther A, G, F, M26, Jumbo, ST-A1, A2, IS2 etc end up suffering a lot in these cases On the other hand the 7br has most benefits, almost all games are undertiered (7br mixed with 7.3 and 6.7 and lower) and 8 br games are extremely rare. Other problem is for the very common German + Japan games. If a 6.7 game happens the chance of the team losing is very high, this happens because as shown above Japan and German desperately need 6.7 vehicles, Russia even tho they lack a 6.7 tank don't suffer so much in this case as most of the games they fight alongside USA and Britain. What should be a solution for this issue?
  50. it had less vehicles no ground forces nor ships COMPLETELY different reality Japanese Tiger and first tiger dont have APCR. APCR does no damage. Firing on the gun port is suicide, most of the times it won't even stop the gunner, hence why no one fires there. Really? Because looking at T29 stats it's a pure cancer affecting every nations. It's annoying in AB it's annoying in RB for Russia and Japan as well not only german. Gaijin needs to bring the Panther II back to it's original BR. German and Japan lack 6.7 tanks, this is causing a massive power gap at 6.7
  51. I think the .7 spread is good but very hard to implement, not enough players. Now if you are worrier the T29 will face 8 br tanks, don't worry, on RB I play 7 br tanks all day long and overtier are extremely rare. If we have one of these rare games agains 8 br vehicles its a small portion of the enemy team.
  52. And why people defendind the T29 only mentions the King Tiger? There are other hard to pen tanks in this game. you could use as example. And the aswer is because there will alway be tanks that are just too good the thing is that we nerf only the worse ones like with the Panther II and in this case the T29. And about your T25 it should have lower br for me but it suffer the classic no place in the meta like the IS3 if it goes lower its too good if it goes higher its too bad. But you can pen the King Tiger with the T25. This is not possible on the Tiger I for example so not a very valid argument
  53. - The T32 got more hull armor but for example i can pen it with the 105mm King Tiger, this is not possible with the T29 because the tracks - I disagree the T34 lack the APHE so I think the T29 is superior
  54. Anyone tried the N1K2 at patch 1.67? It feels more nimble to me.
  55. This is not about King Tiger vs T29. Other nations face the T29 and they suffer specially in AB. It`s a no brainer that the T29 is a little too good. Yes the King Tiger is very powerful but the T29 is even stonger with almost as trolly armor HIDDEN AMMO RACKS, very hard to knock out the crew because the far away commander in the back of turret and a lot of people inside the tank. I think the T29 is more comparable to the 105mm King Tiger and more competitive on same BR as the Type-61, T-44-100, Cent mk10 and others. It should be BR 7 And yes I think the T29 is much better than the T32, the T32 hull is much easier to pen, the magic T29 tracks make the hull almost impossible to pen forcing you to either fire on the lower glacis and die to a retaliation shot or fail trying to pen the turret and the T29 gun is much better Now with the T34 at 6.7 filling the heavy tank void for the americans the T29 can safely be a 7br tank. Almost any 6.7 tank battle is mixed with the 7 br anyway so it wont make much difference. What is going to be very helpful is that 5.7 tanks won`t face the T29, what a Tiger I or T34 85 is going to do agains it????? Another important factor is that the nations that face the Allies (Japan and German) lack 6.7 tanks
  56. This is not about King Tiger vs T29. Other nations face the T29 and they suffer specially in AB. It`s a no brainer that the T29 is a little too good. Yes the King Tiger is very powerful but the T29 is even stonger with almost as trolly armor HIDDEN AMMO RACKS, very hard to knock out the crew because the far away commander in the back of turret and a lot of people inside the tank. I think the T29 is more comparable to the 105mm King Tiger and more competitive on same BR as the Type-61, T-44-100, Cent mk10 and others. It should be BR 7 And yes I think the T29 is much better than the T32, the T29 gun is much better the T32 hull is easier to pen, the magic T29 tracks make the hull almost impossible to pen forcing you to either fire on the lower glacis and die to a retaliation shot or fail trying to pen the turret Now with the T34 at 6.7 filling the heavy tank void for the americans the T29 can safely be a 7br tank. Almost any 6.7 tank battle is mixed with the 7 br anyway so it wont make much difference. What is going to be very helpful is that 5.7 tanks won`t face the T29, what a Tiger I or T34 85 is going to do agains it?????
  57. Can anyone confirm if the L7 APDS pen is historical? The T29 APCR got more penetration than the more modern L7 gun for example. Sure the APDS is much better at angles but is the 90 degree pen value only 303mm? Is this historical or gaijin nerfed the L7 APDS to force us get HEATFS? And why some random L7 tanks got better APDS? If Gaijin just gave every same caliber gun the same HEATS pen stats like 400mm across the border or 320mm for 90mm guns I think it would be fair if every L7 APDS had the same pen values.
  58. Any tips on how to use those guns? What shells do you like?