TT33a

Member
  • Content count

    2,678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

TT33a last won the day on August 25 2014

TT33a had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,510 Outstanding

3 Followers

About TT33a

  • Rank
    Air marshal

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

30,984 profile views
  1. Then tell them to fix their crap
  2. The caption from that picture states that it is an He111 H of II/KG 26 with 2500 kg bomb.....If it was a test flight, would it not be an Erprobungskommando (EKdo 111?) unit instead of the bomber unit Kampfgeschwader 26? Also here is another picture: Yes we know but why did you mark the PC 1400 in blue (possibility) and not any of the other PC type bombs? My point was IF the PC 1400 has a possibility to be added to the game, then so should all the other PC bombs such as the PC 500, PC 1000, PC 1600, PC 1800 .
  3. Find out what chassis number the Japan Tiger was and then use this chart:
  4. Related: 1.) Nahverteidigungswaffe also does not function on the Panzer IV J, the Coelian, both Jagdpanzer IV L/48 & Jagdpanzer IV L/70(V), and the Jagdpanther: 2.) In addition, the Nahverteidigungswaffe is modeled incorrectly on both the Jagdpanzer IV L/48 & Jagdpanzer IV L/70(V)...Gaijin has placed bolts in this location as noted in the above picture.... Panzer Tracts 9-2 Jagdpanzer IV L/48 Fgst. Nr. 320105: Thun Jagdpanzer IV L/48:
  5. They are, at the minimum, heavily anti-Luftwaffe: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363999-1672186-dornier-do-17-z-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364140-1672186-heinkel-he-111-h-3-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363690-id-0057220-120517-1672186-junkers-ju-88-a-1-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363995-1672186-junkers-ju-88-a-4-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366349-0058182169142-junkers-ju-88-a-4-gunpods https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364235-1672186-heinkel-he-111-h-6-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364371-1672198-heinkel-he-111-h-16-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/365075-00580241672198-arado-ar-234-b-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366347-0058180-169142-arado-ar-234-b-2-gunpods https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367438-169169-arado-ar-234-c-3-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367146-0058272-0058273169169-junkers-ju-87-b-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367727-0058529-169175-junkers-ju-87-d-5-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/369293-0058814169264-henschel-hs-129-b-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366856-0058274169142-henschel-hs-129-b-2-gunpod https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364923-gross-bomben-the-lw-biggest-bombs-and-wt-inclusion
  6. No Tiger I ever had hull mounted smokes...
  7. Yeah so what I am trying to say is all PC type bombs should be implemented, not just the PC 1400 What about all this 1945 stuff mentioned in these books?: https://www.scribd.com/document/122306770/Last-Days-of-the-Luftwaffe-German-Luftwaffe-Combat-Units-1944-1945 https://www.amazon.com/Last-Year-Luftwaffe-1944-1945-ebook/dp/B01BHRWX5E Do I have to say 'Don't trust Wiki'....:
  8. It is not a Stuka since it has no dive brakes Look here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367727-0058529-169175-junkers-ju-87-d-5-bombloads Because both Ds are still missing a vast number of payloads in this game .
  9. First, (ignoring the SD 2) what is missing is I, III, V, VII: which would be: 2x50kg wing + 1 x MK 103 (as pictured in the original post) 2x50kg wing + 4 x MG 17 gunpod 6x50 kg wing + fuselage (as pictured in the original post) 2x50kg wing + 1 x 250kg fuselage additionally 2x50kg wing + 1 x BK 37 (as pictured in the original post) 30 x 10 kg in BdC 10 (as in the manual excerpt in the original post) Second, the PTAB has been suggested and promised by gaijin for a while now if "every nation has an equivalent weapon" or so I read. The SD 4/HL is the German equivalent. Hs 129's used them against tanks with decent results so that is missing as well: 40 x SD 4 in AB 250 container Third, here is the requested picture: Lastly, it is just a normal SC 10 bomb or alternative SD 10A bomb in a bundle of five: http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/bdc10.htm https://s14.postimg.org/hcxqybs3l/zzz4.jpg http://www.luftarchiv.de/bordgerate/4ersc50.jpg https://s14.postimg.org/7kqhexrsx/zzz9.jpg
  10. It most certainly is (4,000 kg)...and if you insist that it is not, then neither is the B-24 (3,600 kg) under your logic. Anyhow, does anyone know what happened to the Ju 287 that gaijin promised us like 3 years ago?: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/235604-junkers-ju-287-hype/&do=findComment&comment=4542326
  11. Instant 12 duplicate posts.....Forum is broken Edit: Fixed now?
  12. We have four Do 217 or five if you count the Bv 238
  13. 4,000 kg: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/235604-junkers-ju-287-hype .
  14. With all the recent smoke equipment being added to the game I was wondering if the devs are aware of the Panzerwerfer's ability to smoke. As the Panzerwerfer is a vulnerable and defenseless vehicle when its rockets are expended, will the Panzerwerfer receive its: 1.) Nebelwurfgerät, which is missing in this game? 2.) Wgr 41 Nb rocket, which is a smoke rocket? 1.) 2.)
  15. Fake transmission carried on its back for decoration purposes: Yeah, seven years later... .
  16. It is broken in-game:
  17. The full name of the vehicle affected. If the problem is isolated to one difficulty setting (e.g. Simulator), specify which: Henschel Hs 129 B-2, all settings A detailed description of the issue you have or what you see as being erroneous regarding its representation in-game: Missing bomb payloads (4 kg, 10 kg, wing rack 50 kg, 250 kg, missing gun pod payload) missing 350 kg maximum load A detailed description of the fix you suggest. Provide sources including reference that underline your position. This is up to the discretion of the Technical Moderator handling the report, however the number of sources required depends on the type of source presented: Implement missing bombloads & weapons found in the Henschel manual and other publications User Manual / Repair Manual / Factory Manual etc - Historically acknowledged reference sources - single source required. Reference works (collections of vehicles) Biographies, Books, "expert" opinion publications, websites etc - at least two unrelated sources required.* Please ensure the references have: Report/Document Type, Report/Document Name, Author, Date, ISBN/ISSN, relevant Pg No's etc Please provide scans of all pages referenced and a scan of the front cover of publication/book. For Web sources. Please provide the link to the actual relevant section, or document. If this is not possible and only higher links can be referenced then please provide page or title information to locate the relevant reference. Photographs need to be fully referenced Sources: https://www.amazon.com/Hs-129-Panzerjager-Martin-Pegg/dp/0952686716 https://www.amazon.co.uk/Samolot-szturmowy-HENSCHEL-129-TBU-214/dp/8311100101 http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/h/Henschel/Hs 192/Luft 2129 B_1 B_2 Bedienungsvorschrift.pdf http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/h/Henschel/Hs 192/Hs_129_B_0 Handbuch.pdf http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/h/Henschel/Hs 192/Hs 129 A-B Abwurfwaffe.pdf https://www.amazon.com/Warplanes-Third-Reich-William-Green/dp/0883656663 https://www.amazon.com/Aviation-Elite-Units-Luftwaffe-Schlachtgruppen/dp/1841766089 https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-War-Russia-General-Military/dp/1846031958 http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/b/Bomben/Abwurfgereate Heft 2 L.Dv 4316/Abwurfgereate Heft 2 L.Dv 4316.pdf https://www.amazon.com/Hs-129-Combat-Sch-Air-Miniatures/dp/8389088150 https://www.amazon.com/Hs-129-Panzerjager-Martin-Pegg/dp/0952686716
  18. bombs

    What if it has a more effective explosive type? .
  19. Yes we know but why did you mark the PC 1400 in blue (possibility) and not any of the other PC type bombs? The SB is nothing like the PC. Did my links not work? Here is a direct picture: The question was if there was any possibility of the SC 70 being implemented, not the SD 70 It isn't unhistorical if gaijin implements 2 x SC 1800 internal and 2 x SC 1800 external. Remember the external racks on that craft can handle 2 x 2,500 kg
  20. Both had loose MG with 600 rounds carried on the inside of the vehicle in addition to the ball mount MG:
  21. I wouldn't say that Maybe in this game but what about the 76mm's shattergap problems? Please support this thread so we also receive a weapon to scare planes away: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/277029-where-are-our-missing-mg
  22. In real life, it was superior to the Me 262 in every way but armament and range so if the 262 is at 7.0.....
  23. They need correcting then
  24. That collection of documents is woefully incomplete If the blue is a 'possibility' (PC 1400), then why not: 1.) the other PC type bombs (PC 500, PC 1000, PC 1600, PC 1800)? 2.) the SB 1000, SB 1800, or SB 2500 with even more explosive than the SC type bombs? 3.) the SC 70? 4.) the SD 4/HL & SD 9/HL?
  25. It is a blatant nerf that needs correcting: http://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/168320-achtung-stuka33-the-tank-buster-that-couldn39t-bust/#comment-3156404
  26. bombs

    http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Waffen/PDF/SD4HL.pdf
  27. I will use it wherever I please....The report is from 'Combat Potential of the Armament and Combat Equipment of the Ground Forces and Aviation of the USSR and of the Armies of the Probable Enemy'...(not the 1977 one) It was a mediocre medium tank, with overburdened transmission and overloaded christie suspension, a problem shared with the Su 100 due to the T-34/85s unproportional turret and heavier weapon, brittle armor with inadequate armor thicknesses, extremely tightly packed crew, it was nothing but gun, a catch-up or stopgap design meant to catch up to the Panzer IV H and other Stuk40/KwK40 L/48 based designs It is incapable of overmatching/resisting a puny 30 mm Mk 103 tungsten round with the following penetration (link) nevermind a full blown 75 mm KwK 40 round Yeah because upgrading components such as the transmission from SSG 75 through SSG 77 or the final drives on the 9./B.W. never happened because you decreed it to be so You mean it took the T-34 seven embarrassing years (1944) and countless variants to catch up to the 3-man standard established by the very first Panzer IV Ausf. A (1937)...And even then did the T-34 ever receive a rotating turret turntable? .
  28. The 210 mm rockets are primarily anti-bomber rockets: http://www.germanluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/b/Bordwaffen/21 cm Wurfgranate/21 Wurfgranate 42 Munition.html http://www.wehrmacht-history.com/luftwaffe/missiles/21-cm-werfergranate-42-air-to-air-missile.htm The Me 262 has R4m rockets which are primarily anti-bomber rockets: http://www.germanluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/f/Flakraketen/R4M Orkan/R4M Orkan.html http://www.wehrmacht-history.com/luftwaffe/missiles/r4m-orkan-air-to-air-missile.htm On the other hand, the Panzerblitz II is an anti-tank rocket with a Panzerschreck HEAT warhead...That is why their penetration number is high. And if you don't know what a Panzer, Blitz, or Panzerschreck is then look it up .
  29. Speaking of events, has the event for the He 162 A-3 taken place yet?
  30. No. From the manual: 2. Before the Dive Switch blower to “Bodenlader”. Close cooling flaps. Control, that the Propeller pitch is in “Reise”[travel]-position. Set dive-brake to “Bremsen”[brake], until the control rods are completely extracted, let it stay 5 second on “bremsen”, then switch the lever back to idle. Landing flaps in “Reise”[travel]-position.
  31. What about this?: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/ref/TM/pdfs/TM9-1985-2-German.pdf https://www.scribd.com/document/343071767/Junkersflugzeuge-1933-1945-Junkers-Aircraft-1933-1945 .
  32. Book 1: Book 2: Book 3: Book 4:
  33. 1.) I use a Logitech Extreme 3d Pro 2.) This game is an unrealistic joke 3.) The majority of the craft that I play (Luftwaffe bombers) are woefully unrealistic and incorrect: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363999-1672186-dornier-do-17-z-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364140-1672186-heinkel-he-111-h-3-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363690-id-0057220-120517-1672186-junkers-ju-88-a-1-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/363995-1672186-junkers-ju-88-a-4-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366349-0058182169142-junkers-ju-88-a-4-gunpods https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364235-1672186-heinkel-he-111-h-6-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364371-1672198-heinkel-he-111-h-16-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/365075-00580241672198-arado-ar-234-b-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366347-0058180-169142-arado-ar-234-b-2-gunpods https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367438-169169-arado-ar-234-c-3-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367146-0058272-0058273169169-junkers-ju-87-b-2-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/367727-0058529-169175-junkers-ju-87-d-5-bombloads https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/366856-0058274169142-henschel-hs-129-b-2-gunpod https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/364923-gross-bomben-the-lw-biggest-bombs-and-wt-inclusion And these are just bombload grievances, nevermind their incorrect performance and defensive weapons. How the hell can you sit there and even pretend that this arcade style game has one ounce of realism? It is not correct. As you can see below the thing in-game traverses through 90° before it drops the bomb. This is not correct, in fact it is criminally comical. See the two youtube links above for the actual bomb release mechanic:
  34. More interested in these on the earlier tanks:
  35. Wrong. Just because you decree that it should be like that doesn't make it so. The thing in-game is missing the actual V4's definitive defensive armament & alternative bombloads I don't care one way or the other about the MK 103 vs MK 108 but, despite that, you are ignoring or rather picking and choosing whatever weapons that fits your whim as, first, the armament was originally planned for the V3, second, BOTH weapons were planned (Shall I underline the word planned + 2 x MK 103?) and could be carried with equal capacity due to similar weights (400 vs 360 kg), and third, no matter which cannon carried, the bombload is still inexcusably missing in this game: Yeah with the V4 having less wingspan/wing area/lower powered engines and 10% of the definitive defensive armament missing and therefor incorrect .
  36. What you are saying is not correct as you do not seem to understand the German Versuchs designation. Game model is obviously the V4 with 197 ft 4.75 in wing & wing area of 3,876.84 sq ft. According to you, FM is based on the V1 with 189 ft 5.66 in wing & wing area of 3,735 sq ft. If the FM were 'based off the V1' as you claim then you would be fully admitting to underhandedly nerfing flight performance on this aircraft and unsuspecting players would not even notice. In that case, is the V4 using the V1's engines as well? Once again if you wanted a V1 in this game, all you had to do is remove 3.97 ft from each wing with the associated turrets and implement a new tail: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/330811-bv-238-the-flying-leviathan-thread/&do=findComment&comment=6468911 And you cannot take a physical model of the V4 and splice it with the characteristics of the V1's wing area/span/engines and call that an accurate FM representation of a V4.....because it is just plain wrong As pointed out already, Gaijin's V4 is incorrect as they have conveniently omitted the side mounted weapons that were part of the V4's definitive defensive armament as well as other alternative bombloads found on the V4. You cannot pick and choose and omit whatever data/weapons that you see fit. The V4's definitive defensive armament was documented to have side mounted weapons therefor the craft in-game has to have side mounted weapons as well The actual specification to which this aircraft was built around called for 2 x ETC 503 Wikingerschiff external bomb racks something conveniently not found in gaijin's "data" or extrapolation despite numerous sources and the actual technical specification which demanded 1,000 kg. I mean it is inexplicable that the Me 262 A2a receives these very racks in question from the outset in WT, yet the Ho 229 V3 continues to remain bombless for years now .
  37. You sir are not correct: They (Nebelwurfgeraet) were replaced by this (Nahverteidigungswaffe):
  38. Why don't you bug report all the stuff that is not realistic then?: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/180851-all-incorrect-vehicle-armaments-errors-and-statistics
  39. bombs

    Should it not be more like this: PC 1400 1st unit would be the Ju 88 A-1 or the Ju 87 D-3 SC 1800 1st unit would also be the Ju 88 A-1 or the Ju 87 D-3 SC 2000 1st unit would be the Ju 88 A-4 SC 2500 1st unit would be the He 111 H-6
  40. bombs

    We want all bombs..... Here are two references: http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/sc2000.html http://www.luftarchiv.de/bordgerate/abwurf.htm
  41. Which ones? I hope nothing stupid/rare like a Bf 110 A or B. And before someone posts up an image of the planned German aircraft tree, remember that gaijin made that list irrelevant as they promised us an Fw 200 C-3 & C-4.......instead we received an incorrect, rare, less than 10 built, development model Fw 200 C-1 instead
  42. The full name of the vehicle affected. If the problem is isolated to one difficulty setting (e.g. Simulator), specify which: Arado Ar 234 C-3, all settings A detailed description of the issue you have or what you see as being erroneous regarding its representation in-game: Missing bomb payloads (50 kg, 1,400 kg, & 1,600 kg) including the 2,000 kg maximum load A detailed description of the fix you suggest. Provide sources including reference that underline your position. This is up to the discretion of the Technical Moderator handling the report, however the number of sources required depends on the type of source presented: Implement missing bombloads found in the Arado datenblatt document User Manual / Repair Manual / Factory Manual etc - Historically acknowledged reference sources - single source required. Reference works (collections of vehicles) Biographies, Books, "expert" opinion publications, websites etc - at least two unrelated sources required.* Please ensure the references have: Report/Document Type, Report/Document Name, Author, Date, ISBN/ISSN, relevant Pg No's etc Please provide scans of all pages referenced and a scan of the front cover of publication/book. For Web sources. Please provide the link to the actual relevant section, or document. If this is not possible and only higher links can be referenced then please provide page or title information to locate the relevant reference. Photographs need to be fully referenced Sources: http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.com/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/a/Arado/Ar 234/Arado_Ar234_Dokumente_Konvolut.pdf https://www.scribd.com/doc/81314642/Arado-Ar-234-Der-Erste-Strahlbomber-Der-Welt-Luftfahrt-Dokumente-Ld21-001-Part-1 https://www.scribd.com/document/155556153/FlugRevue-Arado-Ar-234
  43. In the patch notes it states the following:       However, upon running the latest game patch the MG are still missing: