xXDragonJacobXx

On Land and at Sea
  • Content count

    4,756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
medal medal medal medal medal

xXDragonJacobXx last won the day on March 7

xXDragonJacobXx had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,188 Outstanding

1 Follower

About xXDragonJacobXx

  • Rank
    Arado Ace

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

7,636 profile views
  1. I wonder if this is actually true: Because on the devserver it had no bombs or torpedoes.
  2. Update kommt wohl recht bald: https://warthunder.com/en/news/4727-development-update-1-69-regia-aeronautica-digest-en
  3. Ein Account fürs Forum, einer zum Spielen, damit die Leute nicht ihre Stats nachschauen können vermute ich mal.
  4. Tanks/Vehicles

    Could you guys move this stupid discussion to PM please? I can't even remember how we got here, but this thread should be about the GW Tiger, not about Gaijin's event policies, the E100, a possible YouTubeCup or insulting others... Thank you.
  5. The only reason I can think of why M60A2 and T95E1 are not in the medium line is that this line would have 7 tier 5 vehicles if they put them there, and putting tier 5 vehicles in a folder seems to be something Gaijin just doesn't want to do... They could, however, finally move the M46 to tier 4.
  6. The M48 had the same reload as the Kanonenjagdpanzer, so I would imagine that was just a copy-paste error maybe. But the Vickers has a different reload compared to all other L7 guns, so it must be intentional. That doesn't mean it's not going to change of course, but I hope it doesn't^^
  7. This patch's theme seems to be "Put tanks in lines they don't fit into"... M60A2 (medium) in the TD line. T95E1 (medium) in the heavy line. Vickers MBT (medium) in the heavy line. Puma (armored car) in the TD line. But I have to say, the vehicle I am probably looking forward to the most (apart from the Italians) is the Vickers MBT, that reload is insane.
  8. Zumindest ist die 152mm nicht allzu gut. Lange Nachladezeit und eher magerer Durchschlag. Das Objekt wird als Toptier bestimmt ganz nett, wenn alles abprallt, aber gegen die Tier 5 Heavies tut es sich wahrscheinlich selber schwer.
  9. I can't tell, the F2A was no longer visible on the devserver, but I don't own it, so that's not an indication. But knowing Gaijin, if you have the F2A now, you will keep it.
  10. Italian aircraft: Sorry that everything is messed up and in the wrong order, imgur doesn't like me today...
  11. Italien: Sorry dass alles in der falschen Reihenfolge ist, Imgur mag mich heut nicht.
  12. Viele Techtree-Positionen ergeben keinen Sinn. T95E1 in der Heavy Linie T-55 hinter dem T-62 Vickers MBT in der Heavy Linie
  13. Und die premium F2A durch eine neue F3F. Hier, alles was nicht italienisch ist:
  14. Everything that is not Italian. Also, the premium F2A will be replaced by the F3F.
  15. DEV IS OPEN
  16. He can't answer that I think.
  17. Is the E-100 called E_100_TL? Or does the Me 262 A-2a have a special name? I'm curious now.
  18. You know what I think? The T95E1 will be a reward tank for the summer event or Thunder League season 2.
  19. Ganz schön viel Toptier Zeug. T-55 und Objekt 268 für die Russen, T95E1 und M60A2 für die Amis, Chieftain Mk V und Vickers MBT Mk I für die Briten (Die habens wenigstens nötig), nur Deutsche und Japaner (vor allem die könnten wirklich mehr brauchen als eine neue Version einen bereits vorhandenen Panzers) gehen scheinbar leer aus... Ach ja, Tsunderes PB4Y kommt ja scheinbar auch^^
  20. The German companies that built it intended to sell it to anybody willing to buy it, but nobody wanted to buy it. So as we have no actual user, I think we have to go with the nationality of the companies.
  21. If anything he's speaking about the Chief Mk V I assume.
  22. User-created vehicles aren't really whishlisting, are they? I mean they have quite a good chance to be added to the game at some point, especially if they are that well made.
  23. Bis jetzt sieht der Rhythmus für mich nach "Jeden Tag ein Italiener und jeden zweiten Tag zusätzlich was anderes" aus^^
  24. Und noch einer http://warthunder.com/en/news/4714-development-breda-ba-65-k14-the-sharp-eyed-hawk-en
  25. Ich erinnere mich nur zu genau an der RU251... das mag zwar ein Fehler bei der Übersetzung gewesen sein, aber da stand bestimmt für die erste halbe Stunde auch nichts von Premium.
  26. CokeSpray confirmed it to be regular, I guess he is official enough to trust?
  27. Not from the start, many (including me) were getting really excited about it being a regular tank.
  28. Well, it didn't say in the RU251 devblog that it would be premium either...
  29. But you know that the He 177 had over 1100 built, do you? It's not like everybody demands the Me 264, then you might have a point comparing it to some Italian prototypes. It not like "Hey, Italy just got a prototype bomber, can we now have ours as well?". The players demanding the He 177 don't need some other prototype as justification, the Greif has every right to be in War Thunder.
  30. Yeah, I mean if they think the RU251 is ok at 6.7 is a different story, but if they place it there, then they have to lower the BR of the KaJaPa as well...
  31. considering that the RU251 has a overall better performance than the Kanonenjagdpanzer ... oh wait.
  32. When everybody just sits on the flanks, who is going to hold the front line? And who are you going to support if everything you can play at a certain BR are support tanks?
  33. More like the Kugelblitz I would say. I don't think the Super Pershing was meant for serial production, was it? I always thought of it more like a field conversion (The additional armor on the turret came from a Panther, didn't it?^^), but feel free to correct me.
  34. Och Mann, troll mich doch nicht so, im Activity Stream kann ich das Bild nicht sehen, bevor ich den Tread öffne
  35. I'm still hope for the Begleitpanzer 57^^ Although that is probably not gonna happen anytime soon :/ Then again, they said that Germany would get a new light tank this update, and apart from the Bagle and the Spähpanzer I.C I don't know anything else that they could give us as they already turned down the user made VK Leopard.
  36. na da bin ich ja mal gespannt^^
  37. Begleitpanzer, pls mächtige Schnecke! Aber ehrlich gesagt glaub ich selber nicht dran... aber ich will das Teil!
  38. Wo ist die Version mit der 102mm Kanone?
  39. Yeah, I know it's considered a fighter bomber, I was more talking about its ingame purpose. And ingame, an aircraft with 1000lbs of bombs does not make a good bomber. Well, the R2Y2 still makes a better jet bomber than the G.91
  40. Okay :/
  41. And actual bombers? I don't consider an aircraft with 1000lbs bombload a bomber. The G.91 might be a nice attacker, but not a bomber.
  42. By the way, how is the situation when it comes to Italian jet bombers? Did they have any?
  43. Hoffentlich werden die T-54 jetzt endlich mal zusammen in eine Gruppe gepackt, ich hab null Motivation, die Russen weiter zu grinden, weil es einfach immer nur das selbe nochmal ist...
  44. They should really out the T-54s in a folder now ... I have no motivation what so ever to grind the Soviet mediums because it's just the same thing over and over again...
  45. misc/other

    Of course they would not be as expensive as the premium vehicles, the offer no benefit over normal vehicles after all and have no premium status. All they're good for is collecting. As for the models, I don't think that either the SB-2M or the Yer-2 or SM.79 ever had a model update, so they should all be at the same level of quality as their regular counterparts. And I would not be to sure that the SM.79 reappear in the Italian tree, after all they are, as you said, pretty much redundant for gameplay purposes.
  46. misc/other

    They were really hard to get in their respectable events, so I think it would be unfair to those who unlocked them to give them away to players by "just" doing one month of war bonds. But the aircraft mentioned in this suggestion are just additional versions of already existing aircraft. They are not necessary for gameplay purposes and are not special vehicles, like the prize vehicles. For somebody who is not collecting vehicles, the He 51 C-1/Late for example is completely unimportant. But some players, like me (as you can probably tell), would like to own all vehicles in the game, and there has been no way to get them for over three years now, so I think it's time to change that^^
  47. Danke für das schöne Turnier, hat Spaß gemacht^^ Hab zwar schon ein paar mal an den normalen Wochenend-Turnieren teilgenommen, aber gewonnen noch nie. Wobei man natürlich sagen muss, vieles war Glück, das hat das War Thunder System einfach so an sich, vieles ist hier relativ random. Hatte in einem Match beispielsweise mal einem Panther in die Seite geschossen, genau unter den Turm, und alles was kaputt gegangen ist war der Kühler. Und ich will nicht wissen, wie oft es meinen Gegnern genau so gegangen ist. Aber alles in allem waren es schöne Spiele, und vor allem das gegen @Razupaltuf hätte leicht anders ausgehen können.
  48. Hello there! As many of you are probably aware, there are a couple of aircraft in the War Thunder techtrees which players can't research. These vehicles were removed from the trees when patch 1.37 went live in December 2013, so over three years ago. They were hidden because they all are versions of aircraft which already have lots of other variants ingame, so they were just unnecessary. Players who had them prior to the update could keep them and can still play them, everybody else had no way of getting them since then. My suggestion now is, as you can see in the title, to make them available to collectors once again through War Bonds. These vehicles are nothing special, on the contrary, they are so unremarkable for normal players that they were hidden in the first place, but collectors would still like to own them to complete the techtrees. Making them available again to those who want to get every single vehicle in the game would not be a big deal. Each month, additionally to the five premium vehicles, you could also chose to get one of these aircraft with your war bonds should you so desire, and each month a new one would replace the old one just like with the normal war bond vehicles. Once all of them were available, the rotation would start from the beginning again. The aircraft in question would be the following: He 51 C-1/Late SM.79 1937 SM.79bis 1942 SB 2M-100A SB 2M-100A (Spain) SB 2M-103 MV-3 SB 2M-103U Yer-2 M-105 TAT-BT Yer-2 M-105R TAT-BT P-26A-35 Ki-10-II C And additionally, although they were not hidden in 1.37, but in a more recent update, this would also be a way to bring back the two hidden OS2U versions. Aircraft I did not include in this list are the two hidden Gladiator versions and the Po-2, because they were removed from research right after closed alpha (I think), although you could easily add the Gladiator versions to the list as well. The Po-2 can be obtained once a year anyway, so it's not necessary to add it. So, what do you think?
  49. Klassischer Fall von "Sei vorsichtig, was du dir wünscht", jetzt hab ich den Salat
  50. Erste Runde hatte ich keinen Gegner (zu wenig Teilnehmer), zweite Runde ist mein Gegner nicht aufgetaucht, die dritte Rund hab ich grade gewonnen. Bin mal gespannt wie es weiter geht, vielleicht sehen wir uns ja auch mal noch @Razupaltuf^^
  51. Nice how you can already see the effects of something that isn't even on the live server yet...
  52. Es gibt in WT Leute mit Geldproblemen?
  53. Na und? Sie haben ja noch einen ganzen Techtree zu zeigen, da könnten sie schon langsam mal loslegen. Ende Mai halte ich persönlich schon sehr großzügig geschätzt, aber selbst wenn sie bis dahin jeden Tag einen Devblog bringen würden, würden sie nur 19 Stück schaffen.
  54. Ach dammit, das vergess ich jedes Mal... http://warthunder.com/de/tournament/replay/type/188445078843885234
  55. Mit dem M56 natürlich, wenn man genau hin schaut, sieht man ihm im Hintergrund noch brennen^^ Aber du kannst gerne das Replay haben, wenn du mir eine Upload-Seite vorschlägst, der du vertraust, für das Forum ist es leider zu groß. Dann könntest du auch sehen, wie ich das Teil spiele. Ich nutze übrigens hauptsächlich APHE und eine kleine Menge HEAT, falls man wirklich mal auf die Front von einem Tiger II oder so schießen muss. Ansonsten nach Möglichkeit APHE in die Seite, mobil genug um auf die Flanke zu kommen ist man ja (In dem speziellen Match von dem ich die Statistik geposted habe war die "Flanke" interessanterweise genau in der Mitte der Map )
  56. Dürfte ich mal auf zwei Dinge hinweisen? Ersten gab es zu dem Zeitpunkt, als ich das geposted hab, die Hull Break Mechanik noch nicht; deren Einführung hat die Überlebensfähigkeit des Panzers deutlich verschlechtert. Und zweitens, seid ihr euch sicher, dass es am Panzer liegt? Ich hab ihn jetzt, nachdem ich das gelesen hab, auch mal wieder aus der Garage geholt, und das war das erste Match das ich gespielt habe, wohl gemerkt 6,7-7,7, und AB wo einen jeder sieht: Ach ja, @Der_Sack, wenn du auf Turmfronten schießt, hast du was falsch gemacht.
  57. Tanks/Vehicles

    This is the canon the GW Tiger would have used, in the field gun configuration: So it was built and there is data about ammunition and penetration available. The chassis was finished as well and some driving trials were done before it was captured. As far as I know the gun was never mounted, but I don't think this would have been to complicated as it should be able to be used with and without the chassis anyway, so it was not permanently fixed on the vehicle. The Ratte on the other hand was never more than a concept, nothing of it (except the guns apparently?) existed, it's not even proven that it could have been built. And we already have a vehicle with the same fate as the GW Tiger ingame, the BV 238. It also was never armed and received the planned weapons configuration ingame. And it's not even an event vehicle, just a regular premium.
  58. Tanks/Vehicles

    I could see it as an event vehicle (as it is very unique and was never fully assembled), but not like the E-100, that tournament system is terrible. But through tasks, like the Me 262A-2a, would be alright. I would prefer it on the normal techtree, but it's easy to see why some would like it to be a reward vehicle.
  59. 1.67 ist raus (Patchnotes). Also dann, selbes Spiel wie letztes mal, ich werde immer brav die Liste aktualisieren und die Devblogs unten verlinken. Die aktuelle Liste: Wichtige News: Also dann, viel Spaß und gutes Diskutieren! Und immer schön freundlich bleiben^^
  60. Jo, der erste Eindruck vom Devserver ist eigentlich ganz gut. Zumindest, sobald man die Stockmuni los ist. Kommt mir irgendwie so n bisschen wie der große Bruder der ASU-57 vor, null Panzerung aber schnell und mit guter Kanone. Die zweite Munition hat zwar nur 170mm Durchschlag, ist aber halt eine Mini-Nuke, und mit der HEAT durchschlägt man dann einfach alles. Ich freu mich drauf, Glass-Cannons haben mir schon immer gefallen. Wird nach dem Sd.Kfz. 9 wahrscheinlich das nächste, das ich erforsche.
  61. Tanks/Vehicles

    READ BEFORE VOTING: This tank WILL NOT be used for indirect fire. It WILL NOT have the birds eye view it has in WoT. It is just a regular direct fire TD. Hello As many of you might know, the Germans will most likely get a new TD line in the future (And now they have one) with all of the open topped TDs like Panzerjäger 1 (Which is already confirmed as a tier 1 for 1.57), Nashorn (which is already confirmed as a tier 3 for 1.57), Dicker Max (which is already confirmed as a tier 3 for 1.57) & Sturer Emil (which is already confirmed as a tier 4 for 1.59). The only "problem" with this line is the lack of a fitting tier V tank. The Sturer Emil might have a very good 128mm gun, but so does the Jagdtiger, wich is already a quite low tier V tank and better in almost any category compared to the Emil. It is faster, carries more ammunition and is better armored. So, in my opinion the Emil should be tier IV. This leaves space for a tier V open topped TD. And this is where the Geschützwagen Tiger comes in. The Geschützwagen Tiger was a prototype artillery piece built by the Germans at the end of World War 2, but it was capable of direct fire. It was, as the name suggests, based on the hull of a Tiger II and armed with a huge 17cm cannon. The hull armor is way thinner than on the Tiger II tough, only 30mm at the front, same goes for the superstructure which only had up the 16mm of armor. This would perfectly fit the type of tanks in the line before it as they had close to no armor as well. The crew consisted of 7 men. One prototype was built before the end of the war, although the gun was never mounted (The gun did exist however, as a 17cm field gun): The 170mm gun was capable of firing both AP and HE shell: Some technical data posted by KorEEnium (Panzer Tracts No.10) So, would this tank be completly overpowerd because of the 17cm gun? No. There are many balancing factors: Poor armour Not very mobile Long reload (looking at the FV4005 for comparison, around 30 seconds maybe) Most important: It carries only 5 Shots (6 if you count the one loaded into the breach at the beginning of the match). You will often have to go to a cap zone to rearm. If this vehicle gets added, I also suggest moving the RaJaPa 2 and RaJaPa 2 HOT to the regular casemate TD line where they would fit way better. So, should it be implemented as a toptier vehicle of the open topped TD line?