Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 29/06/21 in all areas

  1. Dear War Thunder Developers! We, players of the War Thunder simulator mode (SB), who play mainly Enduring Confrontation mode, turn to you with what we consider to be currently the most critical matter related to this game mode. Firstly we would like to thank you for all the effort you put into our game mode, Enduring Confrontation, detailed cockpits, and VR support. From our side, we try to show our appreciation to the game from it's very beginning. Not only do we play it, enjoy it and bring friends with us to play, but also those who can afford it are happy
    621 points
  2. My IGN is Defbond, I am the commanding officer of =WoVi=, and I endorse this message.
    79 points
  3. 친애하는 War Thunder 개발진 여러분! War Thunder의 공중 시뮬레이션 모드를 사랑하고, 주로 즐겨 하는 우리 플레이어 일동은, EC 플레이어의 입장에서 가장 시급히 해결되어야 할 몇가지 중요한 문제점에 대하여 지적하고자 합니다. 그에 앞서, 우리는 Enduring Confrontation 모드와 비행 시뮬레이션 유저를 위한 고퀄리티 콕핏, 비행 시뮬레이션용 VR 지원등을 제공해 준 Gaijin Entertainment와 War Thunder 개발팀에게 감사의 인사를 전합니다. 온라인 비행 시뮬레이션이라는 장르의 첫 번째 대규모 성공 사례로서, 귀사의 게임은 비행 시뮬레이션 유저들에게 더 넓은 접근성과 더 나은 멀티플레이 비행 환경을 제공해주었으며, 여러분이 제공해 준 넓은 전장과 다양한 비행 장비들 덕분에 우리는 우리 스스로뿐만 아니라, 주변의 비행 시뮬레이션을 즐기는 동료들과 함께 언제나 즐겁게 귀사의 무료 및 유료 컨텐츠에 우리의 시간과 재화를 투자할 수 있었습니다. 하지만, 작금의 Enduring Confrontation 모드가 처한 상황과, 이러한 상황이 일어날 수 밖에 없었
    70 points
  4. my IGN is przybysz86, I am the commanding officer of =HMB=, and I of course endorse this message edit - PLEASE READ I put this here to keep OP clean: if you want to help, please provide feedback GJ is asking for. Here are instructions on how and where https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/530617-an-open-letter-to-gaijin-from-the-warthunder-sim-community/page/8/&tab=comments#comment-9058123 just please, be factual. I know we have strong emotions but what we need now is a dialogue and a riot
    61 points
  5. Szanowni Twórcy gry War Thunder, My, gracze grający w trybie symulacyjnym, przeważnie w tzw. Nieskończoną Konfrontację, zwracamy się z problemem który uważamy obecnie za najbardziej dotkliwą wadę tego trybu. Na wstępie chcielibyśmy podkreślić, iż bardzo doceniamy ogrom pracy włożony w rozwój trybu symulacji, Nieskończonej Konfrontacji, szczegółowych kokpitów czy wsparcia dla technologii wirtualnej rzeczywistości (VR). Ze swojej strony od lat staramy się pokazać nasze wsparcie. Nie tylko gramy, i czerpiemy z tego przyjemność, ale też zachęcamy znajomych do przyłączenia się,
    55 points
  6. Liebe War Thunder Entwickler, wir, die Spieler des War Thunder Simulator Modus (SB), die hauptsächlich den Enduring Confrontation Modus spielen, wenden uns an Sie bezüglich der (in unseren Augen) aktuell kritischsten Angelegenheit in diesem Modus. Zu Beginn möchten wir uns bei Ihnen für den Aufwand, den Sie in den Spielmodus, detaillierte Cockpits und VR-Unterstützung gesteckt haben, bedanken. Von unserer Seite versuchen wir, dem Spiel von Anfang an unsere Wertschätzung zu zeigen. Wir spielen den Modus nicht nur, genießen ihn und laden Freunde dazu ein mitzumachen. D
    51 points
  7. What I thought the new economy system was going to be: +Bonus rewards for top players. =Normal reward for average players. -Reward penalisation for bottom players. What the new economy system turned out to be: =Normal reward (at best) for top players. -Reward penalisation for average players. -Almost no reward at all for bottom players. I am trying to grind France with the use of AMX-30 Super. I also have Premium account; Before the update, I was getting 6,000-12,000 RP every battle... now it's 1,500-4,500 on average with the same performance.
    50 points
  8. my IGN [VFA-54]Corsair4 I'm speaking from VFA-54 SKULL&BONES squadron. We all support this letter!
    49 points
  9. Spanish version ¡Estimados Desarrolladores de War Thunder! Nosotros, los jugadores del modo de simulador de War Thunder (SB), quienes normalmente jugamos el modo de Enduring Confrontation (EC), nos dirigimos a ustedes por el motivo de lo que consideramos la situación más crítica relacionada con este modo de juego. En primer lugar, nos gustaría agradecerles por todo el esfuerzo que habéis puesto en nuestro modo de juego, Enduring confrontation, cabinas detalladas y soporte de RV. De nuestra parte, intentamos mostrar nuestro aprecio hacia el juego des
    48 points
  10. Caros desenvolvedores do War Thunder! Nós, jogadores do modo simulação (SB), que jogamos primariamente o modo Enduring Confrontation, voltamo-nos para vocês com o que consideramos ser atualmente o assunto mais urgente relacionado a este modo de jogo. Primeiramente, gostaríamos de agradecer a todos pelo esforço empregado neste modo de jogo, interiores dos aviões modelados, suporte para óculos de realidade virtual, etc. Do nosso lado, nós sempre tentamos mostrar apreço pelo jogo desde seu início. Não só jogamos, gostamos e trazemos amigos para jogar, e aqueles que possuem condições eco
    45 points
  11. my IGN is RBadek, i'm a standalone sim dude, and i endorse this message
    44 points
  12. Sevgili War Thunder Geliştiricileri! Biz, War Thunder simülatör modunun (SB) esas olarak Enduring Confrontation modunu oynayan oyuncuları, bu oyun moduyla ilgili şu anda en kritik olduğunu düşündüğümüz konu ile size dönüyoruz. Öncelikle oyun modumuz, Enduring Confrontation, ayrıntılı kokpitler ve VR desteği için harcadığınız tüm çabalar için teşekkür ederiz. Bizim tarafımızdan, oyuna en başından beri minnettarlığımızı göstermeye çalışıyoruz. Sadece oynamakla kalmıyoruz, eğleniyor ve oynaması için arkadaşlarımızı yanımızda getiriyoruz, aynı zamanda parası olanlar da premium hesapl
    41 points
  13. Once the tools are fixed I shall unleash Ragnarök. Until then, I'm patiently amassing my forces.
    41 points
  14. I appreciate that SB community didn't lost hope and wrote this letter. upvoted.
    34 points
  15. So there are no plans for RB, only SB? Rewards for RB have drastically been reduced across the board even with Premium Account+Premium Vehicle combos, and this has been noticed by a large amount of players, will this be addressed too?
    34 points
  16. Heartbreaking information. RiP 2and900 Guys, if you got any favorite content creator, a friend with who you like to play WT, ride bike or just chat from time to time, do not hesistate to tell him, you like to do it and you like his presence. Sometime few words means a lot and can be a hand, that holds him with us.
    33 points
  17. Rewards for RB were not reduced, the method of calculating activity was changed as explained in detail in the Economy update post. Changes to reward modifiers for vehicles were also published in full but again, these were not "drastically reduced across the board". We continue to monitor feedback, however these changes are spesifically relating to Simulator Battles.
    30 points
  18. Why were Rank VI aviation costs reductions delayed? And why are you giving the Sagittario 2 such a stupidly high repair cost??? Just put it at 8.7 alongside the MiG-15bis and the Sabres, instead of giving it that rep cost man, cmon...
    29 points
  19. You're making us wait another six weeks for RP reductions and you still make us research at minimum five (where the tree even has that) rank VI aircraft to get to rank VII. Is this a joke? There is no reason to play the game at all between now and the RP reduction because of how much SL and RP you can save by simply not playing the game. Also I enjoy that you are balancing the Sagittario by massively increasing the SL cost rather than actually placing it at the correct BR.
    27 points
  20. tfw gszabi just chad walks in about datamines after being in cryosleep since they were broken a month ago:
    25 points
  21. Cari sviluppatori di War Thunder! Noi, i giocatori della modalità simulatore di War Thunder (SB), che giochiamo principalmente in modalità Enduring Confrontation, riferiamo a voi le nostre considerazioni su quelli che sono i più critici aspetti di questa modalità. Prima di tutto desideriamo ringraziarvi per tutto l'impegno che mettete nello sviluppo di questa modalità, Enduring Confrontation, nei cockpit dettagliati, e nel supporto VR. Dal nostro punto di vista, cerchiamo di mostrare il nostro apprezzamente al gioco sin dai suoi primi momenti di sviluppo. Non solo
    24 points
  22. i consider myself as an average SIM player, and yes, i sometimes do good kd, sometimes not, but i cant have any kind of profit in this gamemode, i play 2 hours only to get 100k sl and 40 or plus in repair, i do 1 match in RB and i can do more, well, i kinda gave up SIM, those repair costs are outrageous, literally unplayable to me
    23 points
  23. Chers développeurs de War Thunder ! Nous, les joueurs du mode Simulateur (SB) de War Thunder, qui jouons principalement en Enduring confrontation, nous adressons à vous pour vous faire part de ce que nous considérons actuellement comme le problème le plus critique lié à ce mode de jeu. Tout d'abord, nous tenons à vous remercier pour tous les efforts que vous avez déployés pour notre mode de jeu, l’enduring confrontation, les cockpits détaillés et le support VR. De notre côté, nous essayons de montrer notre appréciation du jeu depu
    21 points
  24. I support it as a pilot of the VF-54 simulator squadron. upvoted.
    21 points
  25. As a partnered content creator (Brock Retro) for Gaijin Entertainment, I support this letter. We all have our different viewpoints on the development of sim, but there is an undeniable truth here. The moment you remove the sustainability, and profitability required by newer players to develop their skills... The mode is dead.
    21 points
  26. Please if you or someone you love needs help, you need to know that there are people willing to help you and that there is always a way to sort things out. https://findahelpline.com/ https://findahelpline.com/faq (this can help you tackle the insecurities about reaching out) https://www.helpguide.org/articles/suicide-prevention/are-you-feeling-suicidal.htm# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suicide_crisis_lines I'll keep updating the post with other links and resources
    21 points
  27. From DE&S (Defence Equipment and Support), MoD Abbey Wood: We have written confirmation from MoD that this document remains classified. By continuing to disseminate it you are in violation of the Official Secrets Act as stated by the warning on the cover of the document, an offence which can carry up to a 14 year prison sentence if prosecuted. Of this you are already aware, as a service person you have signed a declaration that you understand the act and what actions it compels you to take. Every time you post this you place us (International representatives of Gaijin), espe
    21 points
  28. My IGN is assisttaker I am in TBRIG and I endorse this message
    20 points
  29. I ask everyone to also support this letter on the .ru forum, more upvotes - more chances that we will be heard https://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/309806-otkrytoe-pismo-razrabotchikam-ob-ekonomike-rezhima-sb-protivostoyanie/
    20 points
  30. Why is Saggitario seeing a 700% repair cost increase, instead of an uptier? Do you want noone to play that vehicle anymore? Its not like like everyone barely does play any italian aircraft tree vehicle with simmilarly riddiculous repair cost.. Part of these changes dont make a slightest sense.
    20 points
  31. the use of a large number of vehicles in battle is additionally rewarded with a higher final activity Right so nations with little to no lineups like Japan are getting sort of nerfed with this scheme
    20 points
  32. On behalf of squad LK Team, which you may have heard about, I support this. =LK=NebeI
    19 points
  33. 18 points
  34. Hi ! I wanted to share with you with my newest demake. What if Gaijin got inspired for an april fool one day ? So, are you ready for incredibly realistic graphics ?
    18 points
  35. My IGN [eREC] Starsss2 one of the GLORIOUS leaders of NUMBER ONE sim community. We all eREC squadron endorse this letter
    17 points
  36. You cant see the turret, gun, etc... anymore when using commanders sight. Im askin why was such a cool detail removed. For example you had the Quake vision on HSTV-L. Not anymore because someone thought its gonna be great to remove the feature. It was also good to tell how far above the ridge your tank is. Now? Gone, removed like most fun things we had in the past. Shouldve kept the binoculars with the features they had before if this grand new mechanic is gonna get reduced to "slower binoculars". And just like the tip of the gun barrel sight, its not realistic by any measure.
    17 points
  37. Repair costs are not calculated based on a comparison of X or Y variant. They are calculated on the individual economics of that particular aircraft and how it earns / losses in game.
    17 points
  38. This letter was written also as a response to 2.7.0.146, we have been testing all day and rewards are far from being reasonable, especially when taking into account the disparity between RB and SB. The new economy model for SB is not working, please understand!
    16 points
  39. Actually, most people have noticed an INCREASE in one-death leavers. Once people realise that a match is no longer going to be profitable to them because of the new system, they leave. The issue has only got worse. No. What they have done, is to leave more and earlier to go and try better luck in other matches. It has horribly backfired.
    16 points
  40. There is no valid source material that can be used. Therefore no change will take place. We have made it very clear our stance on source material.
    16 points
  41. Im not sure who that Smin is but it wasn't me or where that is taken from. But I have made no such statement about any event being "put on hold" or the Battle pass replacing anything.
    15 points
  42. Please, don't do that to the Sargitario II, every time you guys add something good to a small nation it skyrockets in costs, the vehicles aren't even that good but people like it, now with this changes people will play less Italy and more of the big 3 nations, please don't do that to the smaller nations, give people more reason to play those, don't do this
    15 points
  43. @Stona_WT 1. Why should we keep paying this "revival price", which all other gamemodes doesn't have (they pay repair cost in case of vehicle loss, which is logical and fair). Big game-breaker. I'd prefer paying for repair, as all other gamemodes, or at least getting my "revival" SL back after successful RTB. 2. If this system was intended as a fix for farming exploits, which custom lobbies full of - I don't see how it will affect exploiters. Sure they'll now get this "standartised" income instead of rewards for actions, but that's it. 3. Those income calculations for La9 look ve
    15 points
  44. It's really disappointing to have a collection of vehicles in your hangar that you can't really justify using without making a conscious decision to trade progress in for 'fun'.. fun that is already tainted by not being able to progress in research due to RP restrictions, as well as the low SL earnings really make it feel you're wasting your time, more so than usual. Everytime I see a tier ll vehicle as a reward for something, it just doesn't have value to me.. I like the German Sd.Kfz for the battlepass, but as a tier ll vehicle it doesn't have any value to me, and I am not willi
    14 points
  45. We have received a lot of your feedback about the new rewards system used in the aircraft SB battles and after study of them coupled with statistics we plan now to make certain changes on it. At the same time, we consider it necessary to comment on some complaints that are irrelevant to this rewarding system. First of all it concerns the comparison of the number of actions in a battle for all time with the final reward for useful actions. For example you can make 10 kills during a 1.5 hour game session and receive only 17% of the maximum reward. This is possible because these 10 ki
    14 points
  46. Please stay safe guys. Remember we as a Community are always here. Someone has already created a topic for those that want to leave their comments:
    14 points
  47. Mig-23M is less than 5 figures [sensible]. How about ending the tom-foolery that is 5 figure repair costs entirely? I get that you want to incentivize people to play other vehicles, but maybe, just maybe, having lower repair costs on the lesser played vehicles, & the vehicles before them [like Mig-21bis] in general would benefit? We get that Sagittario 2 was over-used in the first 2 weeks of the major update, but you guys balanced it. People are using it less. & the people who used it in the first 2 weeks went onto other aircraft already. Its repair cost should remain
    14 points
×
×
  • Create New...