Jump to content


Photo

YB-40 B-17 Gunship Model

American Planes

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

Poll: YB-40 B-17 Gunship Model (10 member(s) have cast votes)

YB-40?

  1. Yes (10 votes [100.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. No (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote

#1 LittlePip

LittlePip

    Warrant officer

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 287
  • 0 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:32 AM

So YB-40 aka B-17 Gunship

 

 

No bombs

 

But has were the radio gun is with another dorsal gun turret 2 50cals on each waist gun point and a chin turret

 

I think interesting for 1.35 tiers T11 or T3 for 1.37

 

Opinions?

 

And I have not found anything about this before and or on the tech tree


Edited by UnderminerX, 03 December 2013 - 06:33 AM.

  • 0

EyPC4Xf.jpg wP6jHnp.jpg

Shot down Jingles and Senio -- USA: IV Germany: IV Russia: IV Britian: V Japan: IV Pilot: 50 Sig by Carrier_ (Meteor)


#2 Lance007

Lance007

    Air commodore

  • Ground Forces Tester
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,279
  • 22 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:38 AM

There is quite a few threads down in the USA technical service section on this plane. About three or four recently.
  • 0
If you would like me to answer relatively quickly, or at all, please quote my post.

#3 LittlePip

LittlePip

    Warrant officer

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 287
  • 0 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:42 AM

There is quite a few threads down in the USA technical service section on this plane. About three or four recently.

 

 

Search either isnt working or gave me no results :/


  • 0

EyPC4Xf.jpg wP6jHnp.jpg

Shot down Jingles and Senio -- USA: IV Germany: IV Russia: IV Britian: V Japan: IV Pilot: 50 Sig by Carrier_ (Meteor)


#4 Bullfrog_

Bullfrog_

    Go home and be a family man.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,962
  • 3 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:44 AM

It serves no real use, but I'd love to see it. I think clans that practice bombing doctrine would go ape floral for it. 


  • 0
 

P38 doesn't have proper fm yet, unfortunately :(

 

xWkgZdY.png9Q7qP9N.png


#5 _13codyrex

_13codyrex

    Air marshal

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,834
  • 18 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:47 AM

The wiki says it was meant to be a bomber escort (18+ .50 cals with 10,000+ ammo) but temporary until the mustangs came in, it is a b-17 but without bombs so it would die faster than the b-17 we already have, if it had 20mm I would be interested but I don't think it would help our situation.
  • 0

X2t9yIl.jpgWT_sig802_zps84154191.jpgWT_sig700_zps89ea9bf2.jpg

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


#6 MADMAX34

MADMAX34

    Warrant officer

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 160
  • 1 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:53 AM

Best tactic in B-17's is to fly a good formation.


  • 0

SEMPER FIDELIS


#7 Don__Karnage

Don__Karnage

    Flying officer

  • Ground Forces Tester
  • PipPipPip
  • 846
  • 13 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 07:01 AM

the thing also flew worse than a fully loaded b-17, so your climb rate would suck and you'd probably be a sitting duck 90% of the time, and not the german kind either. it would be fun though, especially low level strafing of ground targets. if they included it, the cost of purchase/training would have to be low, as well as the repair costs.


  • 0

Greetings and salivations fellow aviator! It is I, that panic provoking pirate, Don Karnage!


#8 TheRibbon

TheRibbon

    Flying officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 817
  • 0 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 07:14 AM

the thing also flew worse than a fully loaded b-17, so your climb rate would suck and you'd probably be a sitting duck 90% of the time, and not the german kind either. it would be fun though, especially low level strafing of ground targets. if they included it, the cost of purchase/training would have to be low, as well as the repair costs.

I heard it only flew worse after the completion of the bomb run, where as it was to heavy to keep up with the rest.


  • 0

Commander of the 357th Fighter Group.
.post-1442497-0-23771600-1341295703.jpgWT_sig714_zps903dd1d5.jpgqDjtspj.pnga09771ff5eb3272d793c3fe0fca80017.png


#9 Mortiferum

Mortiferum

    Full-time Newbie

  • Forum Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,845
  • 114 Thanks

Posted 03 December 2013 - 07:22 AM

There is quite a few threads down in the USA technical service section on this plane. About three or four recently.

Yep.

 

LOCKED FOR REDUNDANCY


  • 0

WT_sig576_zps4ad9f813.jpgWT_sig803_zpsd5266864.jpgWT_sig782_zps29ed4535.jpg

 

 

 

Signatures from: http://forum.warthun...der-sigs/page-1

 

"P63A-10 is a prime example of an aircraft performing exactly the same for 2 different nations... yet one is considered a broken UFO just because it has a red star on it. If this isn't proof of the mindset of the international community, I don't know what is." - Nabutso






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users