Roll much better than it should? LMAO, no its a terrible roller and rolls worse than a Zeros does.
And the zero's currently overperforming in roll
Much faster at high altitude?
Nope, it is pretty much spot on.
Highest speed it hits in game is 645 kph at 5300m, which is 400 mph at 17,000 ft.
In several articles here there are reported speeds of over 400 mph at 20,000 ft (6,096m) http://www.wwiiaircr...yphoontest.html these are all for late 1942/43 models which it is.
at 6km in game its actually possibly even under performing by around 5 - 10 mph.
at 7.5km in game it is going 617 kph or 383 mph, at 24,000 ft in actual tests the plane was going around 385 mph, again slightly off.
Well I was in a playing at the same time I posted that so I forgot the explain that by faster in this case I also took acceleration into account.
Difficult to test, but the plane stalls on full elevator and doesn't have that low of a stall speed, it is certainly not capable of prop hanging any more than any other plane.
The typhoon is actually the plane I see that prop hang the most after zero.
Yes but a Typhoon should roll better than a Zero.
Acceleration? You think a Typhoon shouldn't have good acceleration? what with a 2,200 HP Engine.
That last comment is your opinion, as is the perception about the roll and acceleration. It's over performing in climb above 5km that much is true, apart from that it's one of the more accurate FMs we have.
If you want to call it over performing you are going to have to back it up with more than just your opinions.